As I had written recently, the Earth was subjected to a dynamic solar flare from an active sunspot called Region 3664 between May 10 and 13. It peaked on May 11 as a significant X5.8 class flare. The X-class constitutes the most powerful category of solar flares and has the potential to impair human and animal health as well as degrade utilities and telecommunications infrastructures.
We are in the midst of a new helical cycle called Solar Cycle 25, which began in December 2019 and is expected to peak into a "solar maximum" between late 2024 and early 2025. An unprecedented X class solar storm, accompanied by massive coronal mass ejections (CMEs), may set back societies by months, years or even decades.
The biggest incident of this kind in recorded history, registering X45 on the solar flare scale, was the Carrington Event which occurred on 1 Sept 1859. It caused widespread disruptions to telegraph systems, particularly in North America and Europe. Telegraph lines experienced voltage surges and fires broke out at several telegraph offices. A few telegraph operators were even electrocuted. These telegraph systems, which were in their infancy, were quickly rebuilt. A repeat event in our hyperconnected world however may simply be catastrophic.
To begin with, I am not sure if Elon Musk's constellation of Starlink satellites — numbering anywhere between 4,000 and 6,000 — can withstand anything stronger than an X30 solar flare. A relatively mild solar storm had doomed 40 of them in 2022.
Only remote or rural areas, which are relatively unplugged from our hyper-wired world, stand a chance to revert to some sort of normalcy after a Carrington Event. Humans can learn to live without the Internet, electricity and transportation systems relatively quickly but they cannot survive without immediate access to food and water. Why do you think billionaires, who relentlessly promote destructive globalist agendas, are building survival bunkers in remote areas around the world?
Those living in cities, without skills to source, generate or process food and water, will face mayhem unless utilities and telecoms systems are restored within three days. Humans can survive without water for up to three days but the cumulative psychological impact will be incalculable. As the US writer Alfred Henry Lewis once noted: "There are only nine meals (i.e. three days) between mankind and anarchy." This was said back in 1906, when societies were far more cohesive and resilient.
An entire generation today, without real life skills and hopelessly hooked on instant multimedia gratification, would crack much sooner than three days. One can only imagine the hordes of zombies straggling along various streets, trying to come to grips with life without Twitter, WhatsApp and Instagram. The vulnerable will face hordes of looters and assorted anarchists who will be razing down down entire neighbourhood blocks when they are not attacking people at random. It will be reminiscent of scenes from The Purge franchise.
Without access to functioning telecommunications systems, it would be next to impossible for police forces and national guard units to restore law and order across the board. Even if emergency systems are deployed, law and order personnel will likely face makeshift roadblocks and attacks from anarchist elements. We were given a preview of this during the George Floyd "protests". Hospitals, to the extent where they are accessible, would be inundated with the sick and dying.
Martial law may only benefit high value individuals who will be exfiltrated — to the extent possible — from their urban hellholes to safe havens in improvised military camps or makeshift security zones. These operations may be synchronised with the targeted elimination of identified dissidents. Say goodbye to your favourite Substack authors if and when this happens.
Urban Prepper Traps
Those who had stockpiled essential items in their city dwellings will face new and unforeseen dilemmas. Cooking food from stored items would only alert the dazed, angry and hungry coexisting nearby. Flushing the toilet even once a day would alert neighbours to the fact that someone has a ready supply of water in their vicinity. In the midst of this pandemonium, highways would be gridlocked by vehicles crawling out of urban zones. Then again, if an X30+ solar flare does strike, most vehicles would have been knocked out of commission. This is the acid test for a genuine solar storm incident. You have been forewarned.
The scenarios I depicted above are nothing new. They have been regularly gamed out in various military exercises as well as in movies and novels. During this period, repeated flares of a magnitude exceeding X30 or greater may destroy all backup systems that had been stored in military Faraday cages. Urban dwellers in Developed Nations can recover from a one-time superflare but most will not survive repeated bombardments from the sun.
But what if a takedown of utilities and telecommunications is conveniently blamed on a superflare, accompanied by spectacular auroras around the world? What if many of the recent auroras witnessed from May 10-13 were not the result of solar flares? What if many of them were the result of High-frequency Active Auroral Research Program (HAARP) experiments?
Comment: There is much to suggest that HAARP has more to do with consciousness entrancement, or the dumbing down of populations, than anything else.
According to expose-news.com, several AI chatbots had concluded that many of the auroras witnessed recently may have been the result of HAARP experiments conducted from May 8-10. To the perennial sceptic, these visual extravaganzas appear like a trial run for something more sinister.
Engineered Cyberattacks
Socioeconomic dams across the Developed World are about to burst. The system can no longer be fixed. The global coronapsychosis was a fiasco of sorts; trust in governments has hit an all time low; and it is now time to unleash a new global false flag.
UK Deputy Prime Minister Oliver Dowden recently advised his fellow citizens to build "national resilience" by stockpiling food and water that can last for at least three days, along with candles, torches and hand crank radios which can provide a degree of "analogue capabilities".
According to a Daily Mail report dated 21 May 2024, these contingency measures will help citizens deal with "potential emergencies such as prolonged power cuts, cyber attacks and floods". On the surface, some of these threats have been linked to a "new axis of anti-western states including China, Russia, North Korea and Iran".
Dowden had announced an "emergency alert" system in 2023 which will dispatch warnings to millions of mobile phones in the event of an ongoing or impending national crisis. The UK Cabinet was reportedly inspired by Finland's "72-hour concept" plan for coping in situations where "society's services are disrupted or even discontinued".
Now, here is where things get a little murky. The Finns have also been encouraged to tape up their windows and doors in the event of a national emergency and to await instructions via radios. (Note: The Finnish plan is generic).
As far as I know, taping up exterior gaps in a dwelling is only resorted to under two extraordinary circumstances: a pandemic outbreak/biological attack or a chemical attack. Are the global parasites planning to unleash Disease X?
Just how does a massive cyberattack, solar superflare or an environmental calamity gel with duct tapes? Sure, some chemical plants may suffer catastrophic meltdowns when their cybersystems are compromised but any spillout would be limited to a few urban areas. It will not be a global event. Furthermore, taping up windows and doors would be of no use when a nuclear plant suffers a meltdown. Think of Chernobyl for starters.
But the real goal here seems more ominous. The groundwork for these series of events has already been laid out. In late 2021, when it was apparent that the coronapsychosis was fizzling out, the World Economic Forum (WEF) declared that the world was "in the midst of a 'cyber pandemic'."
Nothing of that sort happened. A surge in cyberattacks is not the same as a "cyber pandemic". Were hospitals which were allegedly overburdened by mass hospitalisations during the "pandemic" subjected to cyberattacks? I thought these were the rare situations which psychopathic hackers typically drooled over?
According to WEF supremo Klaus Schwab, the "Covid-19 crisis" would be seen as "a small disturbance in comparison to a major cyberattack". Oh, so there may be a bigger global disruption ahead?
All the supposedly antagonistic stakeholders have been bought over. The opening session of the 2021 WEF cyber polygon pow-wow was kicked off by Russia's Prime Minister Mikhail Mishustin and the event featured a heavy Russian representation. Rather coincidentally, Russia is on the forefront of the Digital ID agenda.
Comment: What doesn't seem to occur to the author is that Russia could very well be participating in these exercises to get a leg up on what the bad actors are anticipating and/or planning, and the Modus Operandi of same.
Another thing to note about Cyber Polygon is its logo. Have we not seen iterations of it elsewhere?
You would think that the Russian security services would have raised a few red flags over an event logo that smacked of pedophile symbolism. These symbols were featured in a 2007 FBI bulletin and they were compiled by its Cyber Division's Innocent Images National Initiative. Somehow the FBI does not maintain a link to this document.
'The Great Blackout'
I believe our global puppet masters are planning to launch a coordinated series of cyberattacks worldwide via digital kill switches.
During this short window period of confusion and mayhem, these attacks will be initially blamed on the "new axis of anti-western states". Even Hamas may be blamed for this "attack on humanity". Later, the narrative may shift in an attempt to avert WW3. A few HAARP-engineered auroras around the world may rapidly create a new global consensus. The cyberattacks will eventually be blamed on a clique of "anarchists" worldwide who took advantage of solar disruptions and the accompanying human misery.
Your bank accounts and pension funds, in the meantime, would have disappeared overnight. Your Bitcoins will be worthless. Many will die in their homes, in the streets and in non-functioning hospitals. Any return to societal normalcy would be contingent on acquiring national Digital IDs which will enable the provision of essential products (i.e. food to medicine) via Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs). Without Digital IDs, you will not have access to essential services like the Internet or any other form of mobile communications. There will be promises to restore your bank accounts and pension funds but it will soon transpire that the solar flares, rioters and hackers had "erased" them altogether. As I had written last year:
You may have been very careful with your finances; you may be free of debts; free from any outstanding loan for any of the properties (houses, cars, farms etc.) you had purchased but you will no longer own them within six years. You may even have millions in the bank, along with a well-cushioned pension fund, but they will no longer be available at your disposal. Rights to everything that you own will be steadily transferred to a national coordinating authority which in turn will report to a centralised international body. There is nowhere to run in the emerging planetary prison.
Day-to-day functions of the Great Reset Society will be mediated by blockchain and social credits. As for the global oligarchy, special CBDC credits will be dispensed for the management of sprawling enterprises that are deemed vital to society. It will be communism on digital steroids; a dynamic form of communism that will finally "work" after many failed attempts.
I would like to call this engineered event the "Great Blackout" and it is arguably the most expedient pathway towards the Great Reset.
However, there is one event which will throw a planetary-sized spanner into this hypothetical globalist machination. Ironically, it will be a real solar superflare in the form of either a Carrington Event or the much more destructive Miyake Event. Digital IDs and CBDCs would be useless after this event, for society would have to revert to a pre-digital modus vivendi for a considerable period of time.
A solar superflare may set back societies by decades, along with a much reduced global population.
Reader Comments
A proper solar event (like Carrington) would affect ALL systems and process in the modern world, and destroy all of them.
But unlike 150 years ago, >95% of the Western population cannot sustain a throwback to pre-industrial levels. Almost none of our high-tech skills are useful in this environment. And this fraction of the population would die over a span of a few weeks, either by violence, starvation, or harsh environmental conditions.
no one talks about the GOES site showing we got hit with a big Xrays blast yesterday...ooohhh...now if that was promoted, where would one hide? Under a lead roof? So much doesn't add up in our world.
The sun can easily push several oders of magnitude more energy into the earth's atmoshpere than all HAARP devices combined. And spread over a large section of the spectrum - including X-ray.
The latter are more dangerous, they take only minutes to arrive. Particle busts take one or two days.
Big hit yesterday.
if you look at the angstrom units it is the level administered by our diagnostic xrays.
you think this might impact humans health today? As well as other things, or is xray radiation toxicity a hoax as well?
fetal cellular rapid replication is hurt by xrays...mitosis, meiosis.
Which might be coming soon, relatively speaking.
When you look at historic examples of lawless marauding and looting, more often than not, you can find an instigating voice, telling people that it's okay to go looting. This means there is actually a ruler present, telling people what to do. The exact opposite of anarchy. I don't think the author realizes how much energy need to be put through HAARP-like devices to produce auroras. Nor how much energy the sun sends to earth through flares and CMEs..
I agree, most people come together when needed. And wouldn't people trust less in digital stuff after a blackout this huge?
Also always keep in mind that the horrors of "anarchy", to the extent that they happen at all, are quite directly caused by government in the first place. The constant condescending patronizing control of the nanny state keeps the bulk of the populace in permanent childhood, never being allowed to grow up and take responsibility. Then when the babysitter is suddenly removed, a helpless child is thrust into reality which was there all along, but in which they were prohibited from participating.
Separates the pussies from the men - I mean no denigration upon a pussy - I like em as much as the next fella - but pussies don't fight wars really well being they are so accommodating and desiring future life - whereas men, some men - they play for keeps and fighting to some of them seems to be the only reason they was born.
Now some men fight to keep their position and that is a losing battle; whereas other men fight for principle and I count myself amongst them.
Who are you guarding - guard4her - cause there is no guarding the pussies when some men decide resolutely that things are out of whack cause too much pussy is not healthy and well....lets leave it at that.
Who are you guarding? Are you guarding "her" - and does that not seem to be pontificating in a way to say you could be responsible for that - let her guard herself - and truly the ladies lately have lost their way.
So - what is your point?
[Link] - do you just want to lie in a grave?
That's my issue with all of these ideologies. They are floating around in the night sky looking pretty, but they dissipate once they reach the ground.
And that's the -actual- problem that "anarchists" have observed; communism, capitalism, fascism, democracy, social democracy, corporatism and whatnot - all of these have had their turn and all of them have failed to materialize in the form that the IDEA presented to them. This then means to anarchists that another IDEA that has never been really tried should get its turn. But that is a logical fallacy. The failure of these ideologies is the single most important factor behind the resounding success of the modern multipolar, multifaceted, brilliant and gruesome society.
Any of the ideas, if put into practice as intended by their creator without contest, would be horrific hellscapes. Any singular idea implemented universally among all of humanity is by itself tyranny - even "muh democracy". Even the bestest of all goody IDEAS with candy glaze on top, imposed on everyone - to the last human infant on Earth - is becoming death itself because destruction is a prerequisite for creation. So is the paradox of pure good.
The implementation of a political party's entire range of policies, in any country, has been shown to be an absolute nightmare, throughout history. Luckily, the populace notices that things go wrong rather quickly, and then chooses another IDEA - and by the time it starts to show itself in everyday life of the populace, it reeks of failure yet again, and so the cycle repeats itself - by accident keeping the society within an acceptable range of both splendour and horror.
I want them to continue wanting to implement their idiotic ideas, and I want people to vote for them because it sounds good. And as Party 1 fail, Party 2 should tell the people that of course it failed, it is our IDEA - the opposite of Party 1's - that is the correct one. And so people believe them and vote. Rince repeat. Meanwhile, we have a frail stability that enables a modicum of personal freedom at the cost of laws and injustice. Any and all alternatives to that shaky, thin line of societal dysfunction is going to be much, much worse.
~
I suspect we mostly share sentiment, but sometimes the nuance of it is hard to differentiate, and that is why semantics are so important. If there is any concluding statement, I would like to say anarchy is NOT lawlessness - that is not my sense of it....perhaps the terminology is causing confusion.
Oh well - your response is appreciated and I've made an effort to provide a thoughtful response. I hope we can agree that current circumstances leave something to be desired and there can be no doubt that big changes are on the way. I prefer fewer rules and local commerce and local governance. Call me an anarchist if you want - but what I mainly support is local relations.
Regards,
BK
I don't know if a hierarchy that is reinforced by laws is superior to one reinforced by power? (assuming this even happens when there is no more laws) Laws are still just a consensus belief shared by people in a society. Most of them believe the laws to be morally just, when in fact many are not.
The judicial system seems more civilized, but it also forces people into poverty or puts them behind bars - just because they are lower in the hierarchy. I think this is the most important development that needs to occur before self-organizing anarchy can be stable: the authoritarian followers need to be taught about their own sovereignity. That they can own their own lives, instead of ceding control to politicians. For psychopaths, if there are few people to sway, they have little leverage. Like many have said, it's not the crazed dictator that scares me, it's the many people willing to do their bidding.
Democracy teaches people that it is okay to write an X on a form every few years, and that this is being responsible. While it is in fact surrendering not only their own sovereignity but also giving legitimacy and thus power to a hierarchy that then suppresses those that want no part of it.
Basically, I am not convinced that what we have now hinders power-hungry people more than an anarchist society based on voluntary contributions. It's only when you have a society that is used to giving up personal responsibility, that will descend into a power hierarchy when the belief-framework(laws) suddenly breaks away.
The "democracies" in the West have been relatively stable for a hundred years, and are still so today. The problem is, as you correctly noted in the penultimate paragraph, that contentment and the philosophy of not rocking the boat has corrupted the democratic process itself behind the scenes. The political parties no longer have clear policies as such; they are rather all-encompassing ideologies, so when the people sign over their power to them, the party leaders have a carte blanche to do whatever they want. All they are saying in the election campaigns are basically "I'm a good person and will do good things" - there is no more substance to their slogans than that. Hence, they tend to be bad people doing bad things instead.
The whole point of my original post was that it is the ideologies themselves that are the problem. They are -philosophies- encompassing life, the universe and everything. As such, it does not matter which one; if ANY such ideology is implemented in totality, we have tyranny. This of course includes Anarchy as well.
The same goes for religions and any other belief as well. If YOUR idea is being put into practice in my life, MY idea is suppressed. This includes the concept of voluntarism, the esotheric magic that supposedly underpins the Anarchic idea of society.
Just like Marxism, everyone being equal and owning nothing/everything in a perfect, hierarchy-free society is just a loose concept; hollow, nice-sounding, but completely at odds with human nature.
Therefore, the failure of these ideologies to gain supremacy, and their partial and inconsistent implementation whenever tried, is the saving grace of society. They are all batshit insane.
Sadly, the cost of having this equilibrium of ideological failures is that a competent technocracy has gradually seized the real power. You can see it when the big shots are talking about globalist goals and the elected "leaders" are merely lapdogs for a global, financial elite who want population reduction and no borders, no biological sex, no morality, no social order (other than the global one) and no rules. The ones who call the shots are high above the institutions of the nation states now.
So yes, given the alternative, I'd like the nation states back please. Preferably with a replacement for political parties the way they are now; one that is pragmatic and focused on the task they have been given the power to serve; bettering the lives of their constituents and nothing else.
BK
Regards to you.
With no technology we would all become subsitence farmers overnight. any large metalic object even today has to be Earthed to prevent against charge building up to lethal levels. That includes large reels of cable, antennas and Bridges ,pylons, etc.
In a Carrington type event overwhelming our very good protection levels today many fires would result of domestic and business premises.
Nobody can actually say what would happen for certain but the events would explain our complete lack of history and a stone age only six thousand years ago, while Homo Sap has been around for two or three hundred thousand years.
Humans are late to the game in recognizing this 19th century idea whose time is upon us - one way or the other.
Thing is - the cat is out of the bag - the news has been delivered even if it was stifled - and know "we know" - and what remains to be seen is what happens next I reckon.
My bet is those who think they pull the strings are about to be cut off. Cause they never pulled the strings in the first place - that was just imagination gone wild and now tis time for JUSTICE upon them direct for crimes committed against all of us - all of humanity.
Crime of the Century or Millennia or maybe of "all time", but a crime known and proven nonetheless and remember this - justice must be served.
Lady Libra suffers no fools.
That's my issue with all of these ideologies. They are floating around in the night sky looking pretty, but they dissipate once they reach the ground.
And that's the -actual- problem that "anarchists" have observed; communism, capitalism, fascism, democracy, social democracy, corporatism and whatnot - all of these have had their turn and all of them have failed to materialize in the form that the IDEA presented to them. This then means to anarchists that another IDEA that has never been really tried should get its turn. But that is a logical fallacy. The failure of these ideologies is the single most important factor behind the resounding success of the modern multipolar, multifaceted, brilliant and gruesome society.
Any of the ideas, if put into practice as intended by their creator without contest, would be horrific hellscapes. Any singular idea implemented universally among all of humanity is by itself tyranny - even "muh democracy". Even the bestest of all goody IDEAS with candy glaze on top, imposed on everyone - to the last human infant on Earth - is becoming death itself because destruction is a prerequisite for creation. So is the paradox of pure good.
The implementation of a political party's entire range of policies, in any country, has been shown to be an absolute nightmare, throughout history. Luckily, the populace notices that things go wrong rather quickly, and then chooses another IDEA - and by the time it starts to show itself in everyday life of the populace, it reeks of failure yet again, and so the cycle repeats itself - by accident keeping the society within an acceptable range of both splendour and horror.
I want them to continue wanting to implement their idiotic ideas, and I want people to vote for them because it sounds good. And as Party 1 fail, Party 2 should tell the people that of course it failed, it is our IDEA - the opposite of Party 1's - that is the correct one. And so people believe them and vote. Rince repeat. Meanwhile, we have a frail stability that enables a modicum of personal freedom at the cost of laws and injustice. Any and all alternatives to that shaky, thin line of societal dysfunction is going to be much, much worse.
Edit: that is, except a future where the concept of belief itself has been excised out of the human gene pool.