Puppet MastersS


Attention

Agency had 'pallets' of documents sent to Mar-A-Lago one year before raid

presidential helicopter Mar-a-Lago
© Trump White House Archives / Flickr / Public DomainThe presidential helicopter lands on the grounds of Mar-a-Lago
A federal agency worked with the Trump transition team to send two pallets of "document boxes" relating to former President Donald Trump's presidency to his Mar-a-Lago home โ€” one year before Special Counsel Jack Smith then raided the residence to look for classified documents.

Smith indicted Trump in June of 2023 for allegedly mishandling classified documents, one year after armed federal agents raided Mar-a-Lago in search of such documents.

The General Services Administration (GSA) was in talks with Trump's team both during and after his term regarding "pallets" of items from the president's tenure, emails show. The GSA informed Trump's transition team that there were six pallets that needed to be transferred from Virginia to Florida.

Comment: The Gateway Pundit adds:
President Trump shared last week that he believes the FBI stole his will. The FBI also stole 1,800 other items that were not documents that belonged to President Trump. This was not lawful or necessary.

It is also widely known at this point that Joe Biden who ordered the FBI access to Trump's documents at Mar-a-Lago and President Trump's personal belongings.

On pages 2-3 of the ruling Judge Cannon revealed that it was JOE BIDEN who ordered the FBI access to the Mar-a-Lago documents and President Trump's personal belongings.

This was despite the Biden regime insisting they had nothing to do with the raid.

In September 2022, Joe Hoft at The Gateway Pundit reported that Chris Wray's FBI created a fake crime scene at Trump's home by adding their own documents to the scene and doctoring at least one photo. (more here).

The FBI created the crime scene, inserted their own documents, and then photoshopped the document. At the bottom of the photo provided to the court there is the number 2A, indicating that this was a crime scene photo as well as a type of tape measure across the bottom of the photo. The corrupt FBI threw the photos on the floor themselves. They staged this.

We know this because the containers were right next door. The documents would have been placed on a table had the FBI wanted to take a picture of the documents. Showing them as scattered across the floor is for show to indicate they were found this way, a lie we explain below. Also, the cabinets are right next to the documents, which is likely where they were stored. They weren't stored on the floor.

As The Gateway Pundit previously reported, Biden's corrupt FBI's raid on Mar-a-Lago was all a set-up. We reported this when it happened. Now we have more evidence.

It was all another set up from our totally corrupt DOJ and FBI.

In November 2022, we reported at TGP that the FBI set up President Trump and inserted documents at the Mar-a-Lago raid.

fbi documents trump mar a lago raid
© The Gateway Pundit
1. We know that the FBI wanted to make this look like a crime scene.

We know this because at the bottom of the photo provided to the court there is the number 2A, indicating that this was a crime scene photo as well as a type of tape measure across the bottom of the photo. The corrupt FBI threw the photos on the floor themselves. They staged this.

We know this because the containers were right next door. The documents would have been placed on a table had the FBI wanted to take a picture of the documents. Showing them as scattered across the floor is for show to indicate they were found this way, a lie we explain below. Also, the cabinets are right next to the documents, which is likely where they were stored. They weren't stored on the floor.

2. The FBI inserted documents into the photo.

The cover sheets in the above photo that were red, yellow, and brown were inserted by the FBI. They are the FBI's cover sheets. We know this for various reasons. The Trump White House did not need these cover sheets in the documents they held because they had their own cover sheets.

If you look closely at the photo above, the document right above the 2A is folded back. The papers are stapled together as they should be. If you look at that batch you see there already was a cover sheet on that document. It says "Please store in...". That is the real cover sheet.

The red, yellow, and brown cover sheets were inserted. If you look closely at the yellow cover sheets, they are paper clipped to the documents. The documents would have been stapled. They are paperclipped because they were inserted by the FBI.

Also, the front cover sheet in brown, showing SCI, says the following wording:
"Handling, storage, reproduction, and distribution of the attached document must be in accordance with the applicable executive orders statutes and agency implementing regulations."
This document was inserted. The FBI inserted this to indicate that the "agency implementing regulations" - i.e. the DOJ - is involved in the maintenance of these records but this is not the case.
analysis photo trump documents fbi raid mara a lago
© The Gateway Pundit
The President has the right to documents that are his. They are his property and an inserted document saying something different is simply not true.

3. The photo was altered or photoshopped after it was taken (i.e. the FBI was tampering with evidence).

Throughout the picture there are sections in white. It would be proper for the FBI to take pictures of the crime scene and then add paper to cover up the classified info and then take photos to cover up any classified information. However, we know that these white sections are redactions to the photo.

At the end of the article we reported that this was a crime scene but the FBI and DOJ were the criminals.
This past weekend Judge Cannon unredacted documents previously concealed to the American public.

The unredacted documents prove the raid on Mar-a-Lago was all a set up as we previously reported.

Julie Kelly reported on X that an entire pallet full of boxes that was held by GSA was later dumped at Mar-a-Lago. These boxes contained the papers with "classified markings."

It was all a set-up.


Based on the current evidence released:


It appears the entire Mar-a-Lago raid was a set-up by the Biden DOJ and Chris Wray FBI to get Trump. Apparently, the real criminals are not on trial.



Light Sabers

The US and the UK are pushing for total war on all fronts

Schumer
© Kevin Dietach/Getty Images/AFPSenate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) speaks after Senate passes foreign aid bill with $95B for Ukraine, Israel and Taiwan
The Iran-Israel clash has served as a catalyst for renewed escalation by Western leaders, and World War III cannot be ruled out.

The events of recent weeks have produced a sudden jolt in Western politics. From a lethargy that was starting to creep into US and western discourse over the Ukraine war, Iran's attack on Israel suddenly seemed to have had the effect of awakening Ronald Reagan from his grave and leading to a surge of neo-conservativism on steroids, on both sides of the Atlantic.

US House Speaker Mike Johnson did a complete 180-degree U-turn and proclaimed himself a "Reagan Republican" passing a series of aid bills for astronomical overseas spending that he had otherwise blocked for months, as he denounced an "axis of evil." Along with that, a proposed TikTok ban bill came out of nowhere too and was quickly signed into law.

Then the UK decided to devote its largest ever aid package to Ukraine, with Prime Minister Rishi Sunak warning of an "axis of authoritarian states" and amplifying ideologically combative rhetoric. At the same time, it was then revealed Biden had sent 300km long range ATACMS missiles to Ukraine despite having pledged not to do so for years, fearing escalation. Finally, EU President Ursula von der Leyen has suddenly dramatically increased economic warfare on China, pushing the European Commission to open probes on scores of Chinese exports. Where exactly did all this come from?

Comment: Western leadership has purposed a one-way ticket to hell. No side trip. No refund. No return.


Target

Putin did NOT order Alexei Navalny's death, US intelligence believes - sparking fury from the murdered Russian opposition leader's aides

Navalny
© Getty ImagesAlexei Navalny
U.S. intelligence agencies have determined that Russian President Vladimir Putin probably didn't order opposition politician Alexei Navalny killed at an Arctic prison camp in February, the Wall Street Journal reported on Saturday.

Navalny, 47 when he died, was Putin's fiercest domestic critic. His allies, branded extremists by the authorities, accused Putin of having him murdered and have said they will provide proof to back their allegation.

The Kremlin has denied any state involvement. Last month, Putin called Navalny's demise 'sad' and said he had been ready to hand the jailed politician over to the West in a prisoner exchange provided Navalny never return to Russia. Navalny's allies said such talks had been under way.

The Journal, citing unnamed people familiar with the matter, said on Saturday that U.S. intelligence agencies had concluded that Putin probably didn't order Navalny to be killed in February.

Comment: See also:


Light Sabers

Musk and Sacks slam Washington's 'forever war' Ukraine plan

muskSacks
© Business Insider/Getty ImagesElon Musk โ€ข David Sacks
The tech billionaires weighed in on the idea of a ten-year aid deal articulated by Vladimir Zelensky.

Two of the America's most influential tech entrepreneurs, Elon Musk and David Sacks, have expressed concern over a security agreement currently in the works between the US and Ukraine.

Former PayPal chief David Sacks took to X (formerly Twitter) on Sunday to warn that the controversial $61 billion in aid to Kiev approved by Washington earlier this month "was just the beginning." He was commenting on a statement made by Ukrainian President Vladimir Zelensky, who said that his team and the administration of US President Joe Biden were "working on fixing specific levels of support...for the next ten years, including armed support, financial, political, and joint arms production."

"The next two US presidents won't be able to switch it off," Sacks, who's also the founder of the corporate social network Yammer, wrote on X. In separate posts the entrepreneur went on to mention recent reports that NATO allies were working to "Trump-proof" weapons for Ukraine and claimed that the goal of the current US administration was "to turn Ukraine into a Forever War."

"This is insane. The forever war," Tesla and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk wrote in response to Sacks' posts.

Light switch

Pep talk on a dark day

lanternman
© Charon
"We live in an age of full spectrum deception."
Edward Dowd
You realize, don't you, that what's going on in our country is the collapse not just of an empire, or an economy, but a comprehensive paradigm of human progress. The hallmark of post-war life in Western Civ was supposed to be a return to sanity after the mid-twentieth century fugue of mass psychotic violence. The wish for just and rational order was not entirely pretense. But that was then. Now that we are going medieval on ourselves, the not-so-ironic result will be our literally going medieval, sinking back into a pre-modern existence of darkness, superstition, and penury, grubbing for a mere subsistence in the shadow of scuffling hobgoblins, our achievements lost and forgotten.

What's most appalling is that our governing apparatus is visibly willing that to happen. When Barack Obama warned America to not underestimate Joe Biden's ability to fuck things up, was that some kind of joke? After all, it was Mr. Obama and his fellow blobsters โ€” the cabal of Intel spooks, covert Marxist bureaucrats, lawfare ninjas, globalist megalomaniacs, post-liberal think tankers, weapons grifters, degenerate billionaires, and assorted mentally-ill camp followers โ€” who inflicted Joe Biden on the body politic. And then ran him on the country like some demon algorithm designed to wreck the USA as fast as possible.

Comment: The Kunstler assortment: Questions abound. Answers not so much.


Attention

The Israel-US game plan for Gaza is staring us in the face

The western media is pretending the West's efforts to secure a ceasefire are serious. But a different script has clearly been written in advance.
Gaza Ruins
© Substack
One does not need to be a fortune-teller to understand that the Israel-US game plan for Gaza runs something like this:

1. In public, Biden appears "tough" on Netanyahu, urging him not to "invade" Rafah and pressuring him to allow more "humanitarian aid" into Gaza.

2. But already the White House is preparing the ground to subvert its own messaging. It insists that Israel has offered an "extraordinarily generous" deal to Hamas - one that, Washington suggests, amounts to a ceasefire. It doesn't. According to reports, the best Israel has offered is an undefined "period of sustained calm". Even that promise can't be trusted.

3. If Hamas accepts the "deal" and agrees to return some of the hostages, the bombing eases for a short while but the famine intensifies, justified by Israel's determination for "total victory" against Hamas - something that is impossible to achieve. This will simply delay, for a matter of days or weeks, Israel's move to step 5 below.

4. If, as seems more likely, Hamas rejects the "deal", it will be painted as the intransigent party and blamed for seeking to continue the "war". (Note: This was never a war. Only the West pretends either that you can be at war with a territory you've been occupying for decades, or that Hamas "started the war" with its October 7 attack when Israel has been blockading the enclave, creating despair and incremental malnutrition there, for 17 years.)

Last night US Secretary of State Anthony Blinken moved this script on by stating Hamas was "the only thing standing between the people of Gaza and a ceasefire... They have to decide and they have to decide quickly".

Star of David

Report say Israel in quiet panic that ICC could issue arrest warrants against Netanyahu, senior officials

netanyahu israel war cabinet
© Xinhua via Getty ImagesIsraeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu attending a meeting of wartime cabinet at Israeli Defense Ministry in Tel Aviv, Israel, on April 14, 2024.
Netanyahu has vowed that the 'ICC will not affect Israel's actions'

Israeli officials are growing concerned that the International Criminal Court could soon issue arrest warrants against Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and other top officials over charges related to the war in Gaza, reports say.

The court may accuse the senior government figures of pursuing an excessively harsh military response to Hamas' Oct. 7 attacks on Israel and preventing the delivery of humanitarian aid to the Gaza Strip, the New York Times is reporting, citing Israeli and foreign officials.

The newspaper reports that any warrants issued by the ICC would "probably be seen in much of the world as a humbling moral rebuke" and cited an official as saying that the possibility of them has factored into Israeli decision-making in recent weeks.

Comment: The U.S. will never allow the arrest to happen. If it did, American aministrations going back for decades would also be open to prosecution.


Mr. Potato

'Anti-white' Scottish First Minister quits after disastrous 'hate crime law'

Humza Yousaf
© Reuters/Russell CheyneHumza Yousaf speaks at the Scottish National Party (SNP) conference in Glasgow, Scotland, October 10, 2017.
Scotland's leader Humza Yousaf resigned on Monday, quitting as head of the pro-independence Scottish National Party (SNP) after scrapping a coalition agreement with Scotland's Greens. He then failed to secure enough support to survive votes of no confidence against him expected later this week.

Yousaf, born to Pakistani immigrants in Glasgow, built an infamous reputation as a woke activist politician going into the 2023 elections. His rabid pro-immigration stance and consistent arguments in favor of DEI (Diversity, Equity and Inclusion) should have been a red flag to the Scottish public; however, with an increasingly progressive voting population Yousaf narrowly scored a victory. Here is Humza in 2020, giving a speech admonishing the "whiteness" of the Scottish government.

Comment:


Broom

US Navy withdraws largest assets from Red Sea

US Navy warship
The US Navy claimed that the aircraft carrier "USS Dwight D. Eisenhower" and the destroyer "USS Gravely" withdrew from the Red Sea to the eastern Mediterranean and the withdrawal announcement did not include the destroyers "USS Mason" and "USS Philippine Sea" in the Red Sea.

It indicated that the aircraft carrier "USS Dwight D. Eisenhower" and the destroyer "USS Gravely" crossed the Suez Canal today, Friday, to the eastern Mediterranean, after leaving the Red Sea.

The "USNI News" website, affiliated with the US Navy, said that the departure of the aircraft carrier "USS Dwight D. Eisenhower" from the Red Sea leaves the US Central Command area without a strike carrier group or a ready amphibious group for the first time since last October.

Comment: The US Naval Institute reports:
It is unclear how long the two ships will remain in the Med.

[...]

The release did not include the locations of USS Mason (DDG-87) and USS Philippine Sea (CG-58), the other destroyer and cruiser that make up the Ike CSG. Like Gravely, Mason has shot down a number of Houthi missiles and drones as part of the U.S. response in the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden. The last time Ike made a port call it was four months ago in Bahrain ahead of its shift to the Red Sea in late December.

Ike is expected to be replaced by the Harry S. Truman Carrier Strike Group, which was in the Western Atlantic conducting an exercise, as of Monday, according to USNI News Fleet and Marine Tracker.

The Houthis appeared to slow their Red Sea attacks with a gap between April 16 and April 24. The Yemen-based group has fired anti-ballistic missiles and drones over the Gulf of Aden on April 24 and 25, according to Central Command releases.

It is not clear what led to the pause. Pentagon Press Secretary Maj. Gen. Pat Ryder referred reporters to the Houthis.


Around April 15th Israel was warning of it's retaliation against Iran, and there was also the proposed Rafah genocide.


"Well, again, in terms of the Houthi mindset, in terms of why they opted to not conduct attacks for a couple of weeks, that's really something best left for them to address," Ryder said during a Thursday press conference. "I would say that regardless, our focus hasn't shifted, which is working with our international partners to ensure the freedom of navigation through the Red Sea."

Houthi leader Abdul-Malik Badruldeen al-Houthi took to Telegram Thursday to highlight the movement of American ships out of the Red Sea.

"The American naval presence has shrunk, and many of its warships have disappeared and have spread to the outskirts of the Red Sea," according to a translation of the Telegram post.
Whilst Western militaries have been humiliated, yet again, and some analysts have commented that missions such as these do necessitate a rest period, could it also be that they're preparing for an escalation of another kind?


Colosseum

Best of the Web: What comes first, a Rafah invasion or a Netanyahu ousting?

Netanyahu
© The CradleFacing domestic and international pressure for Israel's US-backed Gaza assault, the Biden administration appears poised to throw Netanyahu under the proverbial bus.
In Gaza, a metaphorical "hostage" scenario has emerged, centered on Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, whose political future is being bartered at a steep political price.

Although not physically detained, Netanyahu has been shackled by a complex situation since the 7 October Operation Al-Aqsa Flood, when Palestinian resistance groups took hundreds of soldiers and civilians captive as a bargaining chip.

That operation and Israel's subsequent brutal assault on Gaza has ensnared Netanyahu in a political and strategic quagmire, complicating his position daily and undermining his war objectives.

Internationally, Israel's carefully constructed image has entered pariah status, as accusations of "genocide," "war crimes," and "apartheid" fly liberally around global capital buildings and in mass street protests. This is a language that signals a strategic defeat for Tel Aviv - not at all the 'military victory' Netanyahu had promised his constituents and allies.

Comment: See also: Rafah operation threatens to be a 'disaster for Israel' - Former IDF Major General