|
P
I C T U R E O F T H E D
A Y
Talking
Peace, Making War
The euro closed at 1.2928 dollars
on Friday, up 0.18% from the previous week's close of
1.2904. The dollar then fell to .7735 euros from the
previous week's .7750. The ten-year U.S. Treasury bond
closed at 4.47% compared to 4.45% the previous Friday.
Gold closed at $429.00 an ounce, virtually unchanged
from last week's $428.80. Gold in euros, then, would
be 331.84 euros an ounce, down 0.14% compared to the
previous week's 332.30. Oil closed at 53.32 dollars
a barrel down 7.4% from the previous week's close of
$57.27. Oil in euros would be 41.24 euros a barrel.
An ounce of gold on Friday would buy 8.05 barrels of
oil, up 7.4% from the previous Friday's price of 7.49
barrels an ounce. The Dow closed at 10,468.44 up 0.61%
from the previous week's 10,404.30. The NASDAQ closed
at 2000.63, up 0.8% from the previous week's 1984.81.
There are increasing signs that the housing bubble
in the United States is about to burst. One sign is
stagnating rents with still-rising housing prices. See
this article from CNN:
Why
rent matters
Rental prices hint at whether a
housing market is riding on fundamentals or speculation.
By Sarah Max, CNN/Money senior writer
April 7, 2005: 1:17 PM EDT
SALEM, Ore. – If home prices in your area are
riding high and you're wondering whether it's because
of dangerous speculation or a reasonable increase
in demand, turn to the rental market.
In most markets, rentals prices have not risen anywhere
near as fast as home prices, and in many, markets
rents have fallen or remained flat.
Nationally, owning costs 7 percent more each month
than renting, according to Torto Wheaton Research.
The gap isn't huge but it is the widest it's been
in more than a decade.
In a balanced market, say economists,
the cost of renting should closely track the cost
of owning. When the cost of owning is dramatically
higher than the cost of renting similar property,
you can guess that buyers are speculating on higher
home prices.
This relationship is similar to the price-to-earnings
ratio used to evaluate company stocks, said Gleb Nechayev,
a senior economist with Torto Wheaton Research. In
real estate, this ratio is determined by dividing
the price of a house by the annual rent it could bring
in given the current market.
"In some places ratios are clearly out of their
historical bounds signaling slower growth in home
price as interest rates rise," said Nechayev.
Renting is generally more affordable than owning,
he said, but the degree to which renting is more affordable
in some markets "does make one wonder what's
driving home prices and whether there is some speculation."
In Las Vegas and San Francisco, monthly mortgage
costs on the median-priced home is nearly twice the
monthly cost of renting the typical two-bedroom apartment
-- and that's assuming buyers have a 20-percent down
payment and finance with an interest-only loan.
In Southern California, the gap between owning and
renting is also substantial, though rents there have
been rising at a healthy pace.
In Atlanta and Dallas, on the other hand, it may
actually cost less to own than to rent.
Add to this a slowing economy, even under the best-case
projections of mainstream economists in the mainstream
media, and it's hard to imagine that there won't be
a crash in real estate. As for the slowing economy,
see this article from Bloomberg:
Economists
Lower Second-Half U.S. Growth Forecasts, Survey Says
April 8 (Bloomberg) -- Rising
energy prices and higher interest rates will take
a larger bite out of consumer spending and cause the
U.S. economy to slow later this year, a Bloomberg
News survey of economists found.
The economy is projected to expand at an average
3.5 percent annual pace from July through December
after growing an estimated 3.9 percent in the first
six months, according to the median of 62 economists
surveyed by Bloomberg News from April 1 to April 7.
Economists last month forecast growth for the second
half of 2005 at almost 3.7 percent.
"It's more a return to moderation than an outright
collapse," said Gina Martin, an economist at
Wachovia Corp. in Charlotte, North Carolina. Economists
at Wachovia project the economy will grow 3.4 percent
in the last six months of the year after expanding
4.1 percent from January through June.
Record gasoline prices will siphon
cash from consumers' pockets that could otherwise
be spent on other goods and services, economists said.
Higher fuel costs are stoking inflation and will prompt
Federal Reserve policy makers to raise their interest-rate
target more than previously thought, the survey also
showed.
Central bankers will raise the target for the benchmark
overnight bank lending rate, currently at 2.75 percent,
to 3.75 percent by the end of the third quarter and
it will finish the year at 4 percent, according to
the survey median. Both estimates are a quarter percentage
point higher than last month. The forecast for the
end of this quarter held at 3.25 percent.
Federal Reserve
The Fed's rate increases are expected to lead to
higher rates on mortgages and other consumer loans.
The increased costs will further restrain refinancing
and keep homeowners from tapping into home equity
to boost spending. Refinancing helped sustain consumer
purchases as the economy was recovering from the last
recession.
"Housing, which is the most
interest-sensitive part of the economy and has been
incredibly strong, should eventually start cooling,"
said James O'Sullivan, a senior economist at UBS Securities
LLC in New York. "The single biggest change in
the economy later this year will be the turnaround
in housing."
Consumer prices will rise 2.5 percent this year,
compared to last month's 2.3 percent estimate, the
survey showed.
"The risks to inflation seem all aligned on
the upside," said Joseph Abate, a senior economist
at Lehman Brothers Inc. in New York.
"This upcreep in inflation makes the Fed increasingly
intolerant of above-trend economic growth."
Gasoline Prices
The average price for a gallon of gasoline at the
pump rose to a record $2.26 in the week ended April
4, according to figures from the Energy Department.
Gasoline has tracked a rally in crude oil, which accounts
for about half the retail fuel price. Crude oil prices
in New York surged to $58.28 on April 4, the highest
since the contract was introduced in 1983.
Retail gasoline prices, based on a monthly average,
may peak at $2.35 a gallon in May, the Energy Department
said yesterday in an annual forecast. It's up from
$2.10 estimated last month for the peak driving season,
which runs from April through September.
Inflation is apparent "in many, many commodities,"
James Tisch, chief executive of New York-based Loews
Corp., an owner of insurance, tobacco and energy businesses,
said in an interview April 6.
"At some point in time that's going to push
its way through from producer prices to consumer prices,"
Tisch said. "My guess is that will happen starting
in the second half of the year, and then that will
give the bond markets and the Fed some real cause
for concern."
Spending Forecast
The high cost of gasoline is already
dampening consumers' spirits. A weekly index of consumer
confidence in the state of the economy fell last week
to the lowest since June, according to a survey by
ABC News/Washington Post issued two days ago.
After growing at a projected 3.4 percent annual pace
in the first three months of 2005, consumer spending
is expected to slow to 3.1 percent this quarter and
average 3.2 percent in the last six months of the
year, the survey showed. In the March survey, economists
expected spending to rise 3.3 percent in the last
half.
It's hard to see why the facts cited in the article
don't point more to a collapse than just the "moderation"
mentioned by the Wachovia economist quoted in the article.
Notice how they characterize the weakest point now in
the U.S. economy: the fact that much of the consumer
spending that is keeping the economy afloat comes from
borrowing on the paper gains in housing prices. The
economists talk about a "cooling" of housing
prices. Economists, however, are laboring at a disadvantage
when trying to read the signs due to their inability
to incorporate non-linear analysis. For a good exposition
of this problem by an economist, I recommend Steve Keen's
Debunking Economics: The Naked Emperor of the Social
Sciences (Zed Books, 2001). See also his
web site with supplementary materials. According
to Keen:
Virtually every aspect of conventional economic theory
is intellectually unsound; virtually every economic
policy recommendation is just as likely to do general
harm as it is to lead to the general good. Far from
holding the intellectual high ground, economics rests
on foundations of quicksand. If economics was truly
a science, then the dominant school of thought in
economics would long ago have disappeared from view.
(Keen, p. 4)
According to Keen, the real damage is done when policy
makers adopt the recommendations of economists, who
recommend policies that tend to make the world fit their
impoverished models and that tend to do harm to real
economies.
Economists would contend that these changes have
made the world a better place, not because economists
have actually verified that the changes have been
beneficial, but because the changes have made the
real world look more like the hypothetical world of
the economic textbook. Since, in economic models,
the hypothetical pure market performs better than
the mixed economy in which we live, economists are
confident that economic reform makes the world a better
place. Where problems have occurred, economists normally
assert that this was because their advice was not
followed properly. (Keen, p. 8)
Keen claims that if the standard, neo-classical economic
model is self-contradictory, and he argues the contradictions
are "extreme and pervasive," then their prescriptions
will make things worse:
Thus, the economic conditions imposed to achieve
monetary union in Europe could enforce a permanent
recession upon Europe, and compromise the ability
of its governments to counteract any severe downturn
in world economic activity. Trade liberalization could
reduce global economic welfare because the rapid opening
up of markets could destroy productive capacity. The
abolition of price subsidies could retard economic
growth by amplifying class conflict in the highly
unequal societies of the Third World. Rapid economic
change could lead to social breakdown, rather than
the development of vibrant market economies. And America's
middle class could find its retirement nest-eggs eliminated
by the collapse of a wildly speculative stock market.
What if, however, these results are not the accidental
results of the misguided applications of faulty theories,
but rather are intended?
Maybe neo-classical economics is a way of selling these
policies to the public and rallying a class of technocrats
behind policies whose results they wouldn't otherwise
support. The Signs
of the Times for April 9th reprinted an
article by Mike Whitney laying out exactly why all
these so-called "unintended consequences"
are actually intended. Here's an excerpt:
The country has been intentionally
plundered and will eventually wind up in the hands
of its creditors as Bush and his lieutenants planned
from the very beginning. Those who don't believe
this should note the methodical way that the deficits
have been produced at (around) $450 billion per year;
a systematic and orderly siphoning off of the nation's
future. The value of the dollar and the increasing
national debt follow exactly the same (deliberate)
downward trajectory.
This same Ponzi scheme has
been carried out repeatedly by the IMF and World Bank
throughout the world; Argentina being the last
dramatic illustration. (Argentina's economic collapse
occurred when its trade deficit was running at 4%;
right now ours is at an unprecedented 6%.) Bankruptcy
is a fairly straight forward way of delivering valuable
public assets and resources to collaborative industries,
and of annihilating national sovereignty. After a
nation is successfully driven to destitution, public
policy decisions are made by creditors and not by
representatives of the people. (Enter, Paul Wolfowitz)
...The Bush administration is mainly comprised of
internationalists. That doesn't mean that they "hate
America"; simply that they are committed to bringing
America into line with the "new world order"
and an economic regime that has been approved by corporate
and financial elites alike. Their patriotism extends
no further than the garish tri-colored flag on their
lapel. The catastrophe that
middle class Americans face is what these elites breezily
refer to as "shock therapy"; a sudden jolt,
followed by fundamental changes to the system. In
the near future we can expect tax reform, fiscal discipline,
deregulation, free capital flows, lowered tariffs,
reduced public services, and privatization. In other
words, a society entirely designed to service the
needs of corporations.
The idea is not to have a "vibrant market economy"
or to serve the general good. The goal is to consolidate
ALL wealth in a very few, loyal hands. The corporations
are just a means to that end. This is one of the things
the Bush family has been doing for a long time. Al Martin
shows how it is done:
How
Government Debt Consolidates Wealth and Power... Particularly
if you're a rich Republican.
(Apr 4) - On January 20, 1981, the day that the Reagan-Bush
regime came to power, the aggregate national debt
stood at $1.54 trillion–approximately on that
date, $3,786 per capita.
When the subsequent Bush-Quayle regime left office,
on January 20, 1993, aggregate debt stood at approximately
$14.3 trillion, or approximately $43,570 per capita.
What is interesting to note, however, is
that on the day the Reagan-Bush regime came to power,
the top 1% of the nation being approximately 3/4 Republican,
owned 37% of all of the private wealth in the nation.
On that day that the subsequent Bush-Quayle regime
left office, said top 1%, still being approximately
75% Republican, as the fraction has been for a hundred
years, owned no longer 37% but, indeed, now owned
57% of all of the private wealth in the nation.
There is a direct effect between the issuance of massive
amounts of government debt and how it relates to and,
indeed, is a key component of the Bushonian agenda,
to use the words of George Bush Senior, of the continuous
consolidation of power and money into ever higher,
tighter and 'righter' hands; namely, that when government
debt is used as it was, particularly from 1984 to
1992, to pay for an endless series of disproportionate
tax cuts wherein the bulk of the value of those tax
cuts inured to citizens earning more than $200,000
a year, that that debt is essentially paying for the
transfer of wealth, a phenomenon that we are once
again seeing under the Bush-Cheney regime.
...Where are we in the present in this cycle? We start
with this Bush Cheney regime. When this regime came
into office, January 20, 2001, at that time, in that
month, actually, the top 1% of the people owned 61.9%
of all of the private assets in the United States.
As of January 2005, said top
1% of the people of the United States now own 70%
of all of the private wealth of the nation. This is
a record concentration of wealth in the United States,
never seen before in the history of the Republic.
For those who are followers of the Malthusian theorem,
we know that the 70% wealth-concentration number is
also historically significant and has been so for
thousands of years.
Where are we in this cycle? We are in a place wherein
the Bush-Cheney regime, which has also proffered a
series of multi-trillion-dollar disproportionate tax
cuts wherein more than 2/3 of the value of those tax
cuts has inured to those citizens earning $200,000
a year or more. Indeed less than 1/4 of the value
of those tax cuts has inured to those citizens earning
less than $100,000 a year. That's why these tax cuts,
which are sold to the public under the concept that
tax cuts are supposed to be economically stimulative,
have not been stimulative because they haven't stimulated
consumption.
Real wages are falling and
consumer installment debt at $2.25 trillion has doubled
under this regime to already a record. Furthermore,
the national savings rate, which was 6.9% when the
regime came into office, is now a negative number.
The only reason consumption has been maintained is
through ever-increasing use of credit. But we now
see that there is no more credit to use, in other
words. And with falling real wages, you can't expand
consumption. Furthermore, the regime cannot now proffer
any further tax cuts, simply because of enormous budget
deficits, which are actually going to exceed $600
billion on a so-called 'real' basis in 2005.
...Now, that is a great Republican mantra -- you start
out in life and you work hard, you build up a little
stake and you see an opportunity, you know it's the
right thing to do, you seize on it, and you ride the
winner. As you know, that's a great Republican mantra.
But the practicality of it is different, if you look
at wealth in Washington, the great Republican wealth,
including the Bushes. Yes, there was a generation,
three generations back, that didn't start out with
much. But how is that wealth continually perpetuated?
Is it perpetuated through hard work or knowledge of
the markets? No. It's perpetuated through an endless
series of insider transactions that are essentially
guaranteed deals -- and the legislative impact of
benefits, those with ever larger amounts of wealth.
Most of the fortune that the Bushes have today wasn't
built on oil that came out of the ground. It was built
on insider transactions within oil companies. It had
nothing to do with producing any oil. The money isn't
taking oil out of the ground. It's all financial manipulation
and legerdemain.
The biggest money that was ever made by Harken Energy
wasn't the oil they took out of the ground. As a matter
of fact, most of their leases, most of their production
was losing money. As an operating company, they lost
money for year after year after year. That isn't the
reason why anyone, so saying, with Harken made money.
The reason why Harken became a wealth-builder is through
pump-and-dump deals. The greatest wealth-builder of
all isn't the great Republican mantra, which is what
you hear Larry Kudlow saying: "Well, if you bought
this stock 20, 30, 100 years ago… Wise and sound
and prudent management."
Nonsense! It wasn't wise and sound and prudent management
that made the officers, principals and directors their
money. It wasn't what made those who traded the stock
the money. It was the pump-and-dump deals that made
the money.
People asked me, "How did the Harken stock perform?"
And I said, "Oh, it lost money continuously since
it's been in business. But it was a great wealth-builder."
But you had to be on the inside or have information
to know when it was going to be pumped and to know
when it was going to be dumped. That's how the wealth
is built. It's not what the company does. It's not
the dividends they pay.
...The way to look at it is that the Enrons and WorldComs
were huge wealth-builders. Look at who was short at
the top. Look at who was short Enron in $90. The Bush-Family-controlled
Pilgrim Investment Trust, the Cheney-Family-controlled,
and equally shadowy DLC Trust. Ken Lay himself was
short the stock as it was falling. Henry Kissinger.
George Schultz. James Baker.
...What somebody ought to do is to write a series
of books of the Bushonian fraud. But how it would
have to be– Volume One, Bushonian Banking Fraud.
Volume Two, Bushonian Securities Fraud. Volume Three,
Bushonian Insurance Fraud. And so on.
The reason why it won't be investigated is that Democrats
won't do it. Just like they didn't do it with the
Iran-Contra hearings or the Iraqgate hearings or anything
like that, because they know that gets around the
edges (as my Attorney Marc Sarnoff used to say) of
'The Great Republican Abyss'.
And anyone who has ever gotten around the edges, like
I did, and looked over into that Abyss and has seen
'The Way Everything Works And What It's Really All
About," hasn't faired so well. You never want
to look into that Abyss because in that Abyss is the
Ultimate Truth that the United States was purposely
designed in the post-war years to continuously concentrate
wealth and power.
Unfortunately, I fear the Abyss is deeper than just
consolidating all wealth; That may be only the first
step.
|
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - In August
2001, U.S. officials were scrambling to hunt down two
suspected terrorists who had arrived in the United States.
A month later, the two men were among the hijackers
in the Sept. 11 attacks.
Knowing the names of Khalid al-Mihdhar and Nawaf al-Hazmi
had not been enough. Had officials also known the men
had U.S. bank accounts and were using debit cards to
pay for hotels, they could have worked with banks' high-tech
computer systems to track the pair and maybe avert the
attacks.
But back in the summer of 2001, nobody had heard of
"financial tracking."
Today, this little-publicized technique,
which marries financial systems with nuggets of specific
intelligence from the government, is one of the most
valuable tools in the fight against terrorism financing,
helping to track down militants, watch their moves and
thwart attacks, officials and experts say.
The process takes place behind the scenes, and while
successes are real, they never make headlines because
officials are afraid of endangering sources and methods,
both fans and critics of the Bush administration say.
"We miss an awful lot, but there are some really
stunning accomplishments by the people who work quietly
in the dead of the night," said David Aufhauser,
the Treasury's former general counsel who spearheaded
the fight against terrorism financing after the 2001
attacks.
Unlike money laundering, which often triggers red flags
that banks can detect, financial institutions struggle
to spot terrorist financing proactively, without government
tip-offs.
But if government officials
can provide a specific morsel of hard-won intelligence
-- such as dates or transactions -- that goes beyond
the names and aliases they routinely provide, banks'
computers become a powerful search engine that can help
monitor militants' activities, including where they
are, what they buy and whom they know. [...]
SILENT SUCCESSES
Several current and former officials, including some
critics of the Bush administration, have confirmed successes
of financial tracking, but would not give details for
fear of damaging ongoing operations.
One current official familiar with
the practice said: "The good story out there is
entirely classified."
Dennis Lormel, who headed the FBI's anti-terrorist
financing efforts after 9-11, said financial tracking
had helped law enforcement thwart "numerous"
attacks.
In some cases, he said, officials obtained intelligence
information about monies being sent to operatives. "We
were able to track the money to the operatives,"
he said, "and they were identified and apprehended
before they took any actions." [...]
Also complicating the process are factors
such as the need to protect sources, limited software
capabilities, and concerns about privacy or civil liberties.
"There's the whole idea of false positives: What
happens to individuals who are wrongly profiled as being
suspects?" said Beth Givens, director of the Privacy
Rights Clearinghouse advocacy group. "What
recourse would they have?" [...]
After initial attempts after the Sept. 11 attacks to
starve terrorists of money -- mostly by providing suspects'
names to banks so they could block related accounts
-- the government's anti-terrorism financing approach
expanded to include the more targeted tool of financial
tracking, officials, former officials and experts said.
Banks prefer the more focused approach, saying the
blacklists and onerous post-Sept. 11 laws and regulations
requiring them to conduct tough customer background
checks and to report all sorts of suspicious activities
are too broad and have done little if anything to detect
terrorist funds.
Officials say financial tracking
is valuable, but the tough and broad regulations are
still necessary because they help banks spot irregularities
and ensure they have the tools to conduct sophisticated
searches as needed. [...] |
The US government is developing
a plan that could give it access to hundreds of millions
of international bank accounts to hunt terrorist financing,
the New York Times reported.
The measure would add to the huge legal arsenal built
up by the US authorities since the September 11, 2001
attacks on New York and Washington.
The New York Times, quoting unnamed
government officials, said a Treasury Department working
group had drawn up the plan to gain access to logs of
international wire transfers into and out of US banks.
Such transfers were used by the September 11 hijackers
to wire more than 130,000 dollars and the officials
were quoted as saying such transfers could be used again.
"The evidence we have supplied
to the U.S. is of a much wider range and depth than
just one piece of paper linking a rogue general to
some misplaced act of terrorism."
[Michel Chossudovsky]
The plan arises out of a little-noticed
provision in an intelligence reform bill passed in December.
The New York Times said the legislation gives US authorities
powers to track leads on specific suspects and to analyze
broad patterns in terrorist financing and other financial
crimes.
The provision authorized the Treasury Department to
pursue regulations requiring financial institutions
to turn over "certain cross-border electronic transmittals
of funds" that may be needed in combating money
laundering and terrorist financing, the report said.
Terrorist money has been difficult to identify and
seize because many militant operations are conducted
on relative shoestring budgets, the New York Times said.
Planning and carrying out the September 11 attacks
was believed to have cost Al-Qaeda 400,000-500,000 dollars
and the bombing of two US embassies in East Africa in
1998 cost just 10,000 dollars, the report said. |
The playwright Harold
Pinter last night likened George W Bush's administration
to Adolf Hitler's Nazi Germany, saying the US was charging
towards world domination while the American public and
Britain's "mass-murdering" prime minister
sat back and watched.
Pinter, 72, was at the National Theatre in London to
read from War, a new collection of his anti-war poetry
that had been published in the press in response to
events in Iraq.
In conversation on stage with Michael Billington, the
Guardian's theatre critic, Pinter said the US government
was the most dangerous power that had ever existed.
The American detention centre in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba,
where al-Qaida and Taliban suspects were being held,
was a concentration camp.
The US population had to accept responsibility for
allowing an unelected president to take power and the
British were exhausted from protesting and being ignored
by Tony Blair, a "deluded idiot" Pinter hoped
would resign.
After a big operation for cancer, Pinter returned to
public life last year to speak out against American
belligerence. He called it a return from a "personal
nightmare" to an "infinitely more pervasive
public nightmare".
The playwright said: "The
US is really beyond reason now. It is beyond our imagining
to know what they are going to do next and what they
are prepared to do. There is only one comparison: Nazi
Germany.
"Nazi Germany wanted total domination
of Europe and they nearly did it. The US wants total
domination of the world and is about to consolidate
that.
"In a policy document, the US has used the term
'full-spectrum domination', that means control of land,
sea, air and space, and that is exactly what's intended
and what the US wants to fulfil. They are quite blatant
about it."
Pinter blamed "millions of totally
deluded American people" for not staging a mass
revolt.
He said that because of propaganda and control of the
media, millions of Americans believed that every word
Mr Bush said was "accurate and moral".
The US population could not be let off scot-free for
putting the country under the control of an "illegally
elected president - in other words, a fake".
He asked: "What objections have there been in
the US to Guantanamo Bay? At this very moment there
are 700 people chained, padlocked, handcuffed, hooded
and treated like animals. It is actually a concentration
camp.
"I haven't heard anything about the US population
saying: 'We can't do this, we are Americans.' Nobody
gives a damn. And nor does Tony Blair." Pinter
added: "Blair sees himself as a representative
of moral rectitude. He is actually
a mass murderer. But we forget that - we are
as much victims of delusions as Americans are."
In a British society where people were increasingly
encouraged not to use their brains, the only way to
protest was by "thought, intelligence and solidarity".
|
Edmund Sanders reports
that the crowds in downtown Baghdad protesting the US
troop presence in the country may have been as large
as 300,000. If it were even half that, these would be
the largest popular demonstrations in Iraq since 1958!
To any extent that they show popular sentiment shifting
in Shiite areas to Muqtada al-Sadr's position on the
American presence, they would indicate that he is winning
politically even though the US defeated his militia
militarily.
Big demonstrations were also held in Ramadi and in
Najaf.
In Baghad, Shaikh Mu'ayyad al-Khazraji, a Sadr aide,
said that the demonstrations would continue, to pressure
the parliament to demand a US withdrawal.
Al-Hayat reports that Muqtada urged his followers not
to bear arms and were not to reply with gunfire if they
were shot at by the Americans, saying that God would
be responsible for defeating the Occupiers." The
demonstrators demanded a swift trial of Saddam Hussein,
a timetable for US withdrawal, the release of Iraqis
detained by the US, and an end to the marginalization
of the opposition. The demonstrators carried effigies
of Saddam Hussein, President Bush and UK Prime Minister
Tony Blair, each labeled "International Terrorist."
Ash-Sharq al-Awsat says that the crowds also demanded
an end to torture in Iraqi prisons.
Off to the side a small crowd of Iraqi Christians joined
in the demonstration, with placards saying, "We
support the call of Sayyid Muqtada for national unity."
In a sermon read for him, Muqtada accused the United
States of double standards-- allowing Israel to have
the bomb but bothering Muslim powers who have a nuclear
program.
The demonstration's magnitude appears to have convinced
prime minister designate, Ibrahim Jaafari of the Dawa
Party, to begin speaking once again of a timetable for
the withdrawal of foreign troops.
The United Arab Front in Kirkuk demanded the creation
of a militia to protect the Arabs of that city from
the Kurdish "security militias" [i.e. the
Kurdish-dominated police force in the city]. Shaikh
Wasfi al-Asi, the leader of the Front, said that Iraq
is an Arab country and an inseparable part of the Arab
world, and that it is inappropriate for Jalal Talabani
to be president, because he is a Kurd and is trying
to evict Arabs from Kirkuk. (Al-Asi is a good representative
of the peculiar Iraqi Baath racism that ran wild in
the Saddam era). |
Some
journalists are silenced, while others seem happy to silence
themselves War fever in the wake of the September
11 attacks has led to a wave of self-censorship as well
as government pressure on the media. With American flags
adorning networks' on-screen logos, journalists are
feeling rising pressure to exercise "patriotic"
news judgment, while even mild criticism of the military,
George W. Bush and U.S. foreign policy are coming to
seem taboo.
On September 17, Bill Maher,
host of ABC’s Politically Incorrect, took issue
with Bush's characterization of the hijackers as "cowards,"
saying that the label could more plausibly be applied
to the U.S. military’s long-range cruise missile
attacks than to the hijackers' suicide missions.
Maher, a hawk on military issues, intended his comment
as a criticism of Bill Clinton's emphasis on air power
over ground troops, but major advertisers, including
Federal Express and Sears, dropped their sponsorship,
and several ABC affiliate stations dropped Maher’s
show from their lineups (Washington Post, 9/28/01).
Commenting at an official news
briefing, White House spokesman Ari Fleischer called
Maher's remark "a terrible thing to say,"
adding, "There are
reminders to all Americans that they need to watch what
they say, watch what they do, and this is not
a time for remarks like that; there never is."
The White House's transcript
of Fleischer's remarks mysteriously omitted the chilling
phrase "watch what they say," in what White
House officials later called a "transcription error"
(New York Times, 9/28/01).
Maher might consider himself lucky to still have a
job. A columnist for the Oregon Daily Courier,
Dan Guthrie, said he was fired for writing a column
(9/15/01) that criticized Bush for "hiding in a
Nebraska hole" in the aftermath of the September
11 attacks (Associated Press, 9/26/01). After
the column sparked angry letters to the editor, the
paper's publisher printed an apology to readers (9/18/01):
"Criticism of our chief executive and those around
him needs to be responsible and appropriate.
Labeling him and the nation's other top leaders as cowards
as the United States tries to unite after its bloodiest
terrorist attack ever isn't responsible or appropriate."
The publisher denied Guthrie was fired for what he wrote,
but declined to elaborate.
Similarly, the city editor of
the Texas City Sun, Tom Gutting, was fired after writing
a column (9/22/01) critical of Bush’s actions
the day of the attacks. His column was also the
subject of an apology from the paper's publisher (9/21/01),
who wrote an accompanying op-ed
headlined "Bush's Leadership Has Been Superb"
(Editor & Publisher, 9/27/01).
Veteran progressive radio host Peter Werbe found that
in the wake of the terrorist attacks, his syndicated
show was no longer wanted at KSCO-KOMY-AM in Santa Cruz,
Calif. On October 6, station co-owner Michael Zwerling
came on the air to criticize Werbe’s program.
Days later, Kay Zwerling, Michael’s mother, denounced
the show’s political content and criticism of
the Bush administration in an on-air editorial, saying
"partisanship is out; we
are all Americans now." She added that "we
cannot afford the luxury of political divisiveness."
Apparently accusations that peace marchers are committing
"treason" and calls for "nuking Afghanistan"
made by right-wing syndicated host Michael Savage, who
is aired on the station for six hours daily, do not
qualify as divisive (Metro Santa Cruz, 10/24/01).
"Just tell me where"
Other journalists loudly proclaimed their support for
the government and military action. CBS Evening News
anchor Dan Rather was the most conspicuous, declaring
on CBS’s Late Show with David Letterman (9/17/01):
"George Bush is the president. He makes the decisions,
and, you know, it's just one American, wherever he wants
me to line up, just tell me where. And he'll make the
call." Rather issued a similar call on the show
Entertainment Tonight (10/2/01), according to a transcript
from the Media Research Center: "If he needs me
in uniform, tell me when and where--I'm there."
It should be remembered that Rather is not only a news
reader but also the managing editor of CBS Evening News,
and his attitude has the potential to influence the
work of the reporters who work under him. Both
ABC and NBC have dealt with the criticisms of the U.S.
food aid program in Afghanistan, airing the views of
aid workers in the region who dismissed the food program
as an ineffective PR ploy. CBS Evening News did
not address the issue.
ABC’s Cokie Roberts also appeared on the Letterman
show (10/10/01) to proclaim her deep faith in military
spokespeople: "Look, I am,
I will just confess to you, a total sucker for the guys
who stand up with all the ribbons on and stuff and they
say it's true and I'm ready to believe it."
At the dozens of stations owned by the Sinclair Broadcast
Group, pro-Bush editorial statements were read on the
air by station managers. At Sinclair’s WBBF and
WNUV in Baltimore, news anchors and other on-air journalists
read the statements (Baltimore Sun, 10/4/01).
"Reining in" journalism
Attempts by the U.S. government to exert control over
media have been broad. In early October, Secretary of
State Colin Powell voiced his concerns about the Al
Jazeera television station during a meeting with Sheik
Hamad bin Khalifa Thani, the emir of Qatar. Powell reportedly
told Thani to "rein in" Al Jazeera, which
operates out of Qatar and relies on the government for
significant funding (Washington Post, 10/9/01). Though
the channel is considered by many to be the most independent
TV news outlet in the Arab world, Powell and other U.S.
officials were reportedly upset by the channel re-airing
old interviews with bin Laden and the inclusion of guests
that are too critical of the United States on its programs.
(In attempting to muzzle Al Jazeera, Powell was mirroring
the complaints of Arab nationalists who contend that
the channel too often airs the views of Israelis and
Western officials.)
Once the air strikes began, Al Jazeera provided the
only footage coming out of Taliban-controlled Afghanistan,
documenting the killing and maiming of civilians. The
station also aired videotaped statements delivered to
it by Osama bin Laden’s Al Qaeda group--which
were picked up and replayed by U.S. television networks.
In an October 10 conference call with national security
adviser Condoleeza Rice, executives from ABC, CBS, NBC,
Fox and CNN reportedly acceded to her "suggestion"
that any future taped statements from Al Qaeda be "abridged,"
and any potentially "inflammatory" language
removed before broadcast.
Originally, the administration expressed concern about
the possibility of Al Qaeda members sending "coded
messages" to their followers in the segments--without
offering any evidence that such a technique had ever
been used, or that censoring U.S. news broadcasts would
be an effective means of keeping any messages that did
exist from terrorists.
But Rice's main argument to the networks seems to have
been that bin Laden's statements should be restricted
because of their overt content. NBC News chief Neal
Shapiro told the New York Times (10/11/01) that Rice's
main point "was that here was a charismatic speaker
who could arouse anti-American sentiment getting 20
minutes of air time to spew hatred and urge his followers
to kill Americans."
The following day, Fleischer took the administration's
campaign further and contacted major newspapers to request
that they consider not printing full transcripts of
bin Laden's messages. "The request is to report
the news to the American people," said Fleischer
(New York Times, 10/12/01). "But if you report
it in its entirety, that could raise concerns that he's
getting his prepackaged, pretaped message out."
To its credit, the New York Times has apparently resisted
such requests, even editorializing (10/11/01) that the
"White House effort is ill advised." But some
media executives seemed to actually appreciate the White
House pressure. In an official statement, CNN declared:
"In deciding what to air,
CNN will consider guidance from appropriate authorities''
(Associated Press, 10/10/01). CNN chief Walter
Isaacson added, "After hearing Dr. Rice, we're
not going to step on the land mines she was talking
about" (New York Times, 10/11/01). "We'll
do whatever is our patriotic duty,'' said News
Corp executive Rupert Murdoch (Reuters, 10/11/01), who
took U.S. citizenship when his Australian passport interfered
with his buying American TV stations.
Indeed, when a taped segment from bin Laden spokesman
Suleiman Abu Gheith aired on Al Jazeera on October 13,
U.S. networks handled it much differently than previous
statements. Fox News Channel and MSNBC did not air any
of the footage, while the other networks opted to show
only portions of the tape, or paraphrase the content
(Associated Press, 10/31/01).
Dangerously unbiased
Powell was not the only government official who seemed
to think that a national emergency gave them license
to attempt to interfere with news outlets. On September
21, the federally funded Voice of America radio service
temporarily held a news story that featured comments
from Taliban leader Mullah Mohammed Omar after the State
Department complained to Voice of America‘s board
of governors (Washington Post, 9/23/01). When the station
played the segment anyway, State Department spokesperson
Richard Boucher (press conference, 9/24/01) criticized
Voice of America for "asking the U.S. taxpayer
to pay for broadcasting this guy's voice back into Afghanistan."
Some media heavyweights shared that view: The New York
Times’ William Safire (10/1/01) was clearly upset
that the "seat-warmer at the Voice of America could
not restrain its news directors from broadcasting the
incendiary diatribes of Taliban leaders."
At KOMU-TV in St. Louis, run
by faculty and students at the University of Missouri,
on-air news personnel were prohibited from wearing anything
that might indicate support for a particular cause,
including flags or patriotic ribbons. This prompted
state Rep. Matt Bartle to send an email to the station’s
news director that threatened the KOMU’s state
funding: "If this is what you are teaching the
next generation of journalists, I question whether the
taxpayers of this state will support it"
(Ft. Worth Star-Telegram, 9/30/01).
It appears that journalistic neutrality is a dangerous
message to send these days. When Cablevision’s
News 12 station in Long Island, N.Y. adopted a no-flag
policy for its on-air personnel, it wasn’t government
officials that were upset by the supposed lack of patriotism--it
was the station’s advertisers. One station official
told the New York Times (10/7/01) that "a number
of clients are talking about running their ads somewhere
else." In such an environment, it shouldn’t
be surprising that news that might portray the military
in an unflattering light would also be censored. An
Associated Press photo taken aboard the U.S.S. Enterprise
showed a bomb with "high jack this fags" scrawled
on it, apparently the work of an American soldier. The
AP withdrew the photo, instructing news outlets not
to run it in their papers (PlanetOut.com, 10/12/01).
Mainstream media have shown little interest in reporting
on the incident--suggesting that self-censorship is
itself a phenomenon that might be too hot to cover.
|
THE HAGUE - A Dutch airline KLM
plane on a direct flight from Amsterdam to Mexico was
forced to turn back after US authorities barred it from
entering their airspace because it was carrying two
unwanted passengers.
The plane, which had been carrying
287 passengers, had not been scheduled to land in the
United States but needed to fly through US airspace
to pass from Canada to Mexico.
The aircraft was already nearing Canada when the pilot
was told he would not be allowed to enter US airspace,
KLM spokesman Bart Koster told AFP on Sunday.
The identity of the two suspect passengers
is not known and the KLM would not comment on why the
US authorities barred them from the US airspace, referring
all question back to the Americans.
"KLM always checks its passenger lists to see
if any names match up with people wanted by the authorities
or to see if THEY are on a KLM blacklist of aggressive
passengers and we allow these two to fly with us,"
Koster said.
The suspected passengers were not arrested
on their return to the Netherlands because Dutch authorities
saw no reason to detain them, the ANP news agency reported.
In the past KLM has refused to fly passengers to the
United States and Washington has made it clear that
certain passengers would not be allowed but never this
late into a flight, according to Koster.
"This is the first time
something like this happened," according
to the spokesman. The KLM is trying to contact the US
authorities to try to figure out where the mismatch
in information occurred, he added.
After the plane returned to Amsterdam's Schiphol airport
Saturday the remaining 285 passengers were put on another
plane and flown to Mexico without any problems. |
Supreme Court Justice
Anthony M. Kennedy is a fairly accomplished jurist, but
he might want to get himself a good lawyer -- and perhaps
a few more bodyguards.
Conservative leaders meeting in Washington yesterday
for a discussion of "Remedies to Judicial Tyranny"
decided that Kennedy, a Ronald Reagan appointee, should
be impeached, or worse.
Phyllis Schlafly, doyenne of American
conservatism, said Kennedy's opinion forbidding capital
punishment for juveniles "is a good ground of impeachment."
To cheers and applause from those gathered at a
downtown Marriott for a conference on "Confronting
the Judicial War on Faith," Schlafly said that Kennedy
had not met the "good behavior" requirement
for office and that "Congress ought to talk about
impeachment."
Next, Michael P. Farris, chairman of
the Home School Legal Defense Association, said Kennedy
"should be the poster boy for impeachment" for
citing international norms in his opinions. "If our
congressmen and senators do not have the courage to impeach
and remove from office Justice Kennedy, they ought to
be impeached as well."
Not to be outdone, lawyer-author Edwin Vieira told the
gathering that Kennedy should be impeached because his
philosophy, evidenced in his opinion striking down an
anti-sodomy statute, "upholds Marxist, Leninist,
satanic principles drawn from foreign law."
Ominously, Vieira continued by saying his "bottom
line" for dealing with the Supreme Court comes from
Joseph Stalin. "He had a slogan, and it worked very
well for him, whenever he ran into difficulty: 'no man,
no problem,' " Vieira said.
The full Stalin quote, for those who don't recognize
it, is "Death solves all problems: no man, no problem."
Presumably, Vieira had in mind something less extreme
than Stalin did and was not actually advocating violence.
But then, these are scary times for the judiciary. An
anti-judge furor may help confirm President Bush's judicial
nominees, but it also has the potential to turn ugly.
A judge in Atlanta and the husband and mother of a judge
in Chicago were murdered in recent weeks. After federal
courts spurned a request from Congress to revisit the
Terri Schiavo case, House Majority Leader Tom DeLay (R-Tex.)
said that "the time will come for the men responsible
for this to answer for their behavior." Sen. John
Cornyn (R-Tex.) mused about how a perception that judges
are making political decisions could lead people to "engage
in violence."
"The people who have been speaking out on this,
like Tom DeLay and Senator Cornyn, need to be backed up,"
Schlafly said to applause yesterday. One worker at the
event wore a sticker declaring "Hooray for DeLay."
The conference was organized during
the height of the Schiavo controversy by a new group,
the Judeo-Christian Council for Constitutional Restoration.
This was no collection of fringe characters. The two-day
program listed two House members; aides to two senators;
representatives from the Family Research Council and Concerned
Women for America; conservative activists Alan Keyes and
Morton C. Blackwell; the lawyer for Terri Schiavo's parents;
Alabama's "Ten Commandments" judge, Roy Moore;
and DeLay, who canceled to attend the pope's funeral.
The Schlafly session's moderator, Richard Lessner of
the American Conservative Union, opened the discussion
by decrying a "radical secularist relativist judiciary."
It turned more harsh from there.
Schlafly called for passage of a quartet
of bills in Congress that would remove courts' power to
review religious displays, the Pledge of Allegiance, same-sex
marriage and the Boy Scouts. Her speech brought a subtle
change in the argument against the courts from emphasizing
"activist" judges -- it was, after all, inaction
by federal judges that doomed Schiavo -- to "supremacist"
judges. "The Constitution is not what the Supreme
Court says it is," Schlafly asserted.
Former representative William Dannemeyer
(R-Calif.) followed Schlafly, saying the country's "principal
problem" is not Iraq or the federal budget but whether
"we as a people acknowledge that God exists."
Farris then told the crowd he is "sick and tired
of having to lobby people I helped get elected."
A better-educated citizenry, he said, would know that
"Medicare is a bad idea" and that "Social
Security is a horrible idea when run by the government."
Farris said he would block judicial power by abolishing
the concept of binding judicial precedents, by allowing
Congress to vacate court decisions, and by impeaching
judges such as Kennedy, who seems to have replaced Justice
David H. Souter as the target of conservative ire. "If
about 40 of them get impeached, suddenly a lot of these
guys would be retiring," he said.
Vieira, a constitutional lawyer
who wrote "How to Dethrone the Imperial Judiciary,"
escalated the charges, saying a Politburo of "five
people on the Supreme Court" has a "revolutionary
agenda" rooted in foreign law and situational ethics.
Vieira, his eyeglasses strapped to his head with black
elastic, decried the "primordial illogic" of
the courts.
Invoking Stalin, Vieira delivered the "no man, no
problem" line twice for emphasis. "This is not
a structural problem we have; this is a problem of personnel,"
he said. "We are in this mess because we have the
wrong people as judges."
A court spokeswoman declined to comment. |
ROME, Ga. -- A high school is
looking for a few good snitches. Using revenue from
its candy and soda sales, Model
High School plans to pay up to $100 for information
about thefts and drug or gun possession on campus.
"It's not that we feel there
are any problems here," said Principal Glenn White.
"It's a proactive move for getting information
that will help deter any sort of illegal activity."
Under the new policy, a student would receive $10 for
information about a theft on campus, $25 or $50 for
information about drug possession, and $100 for information
about gun possession or other serious felonies.
Informants will not receive the reward if they are
involved in the crime, White said.
At nearby Rome High School, there
is no similar program because students there have a
rapport with officials and are comfortable providing
information, said Superintendent Gayland Cooper.
"We feel the reward is the kids knowing they have
a safe school," Cooper said.
The idea for the program came from Kell High School
in Marietta, an Atlanta suburb. There,
student tips earlier this year led to the arrest of
a classmate who had brought a handgun to school.
No Model High students have received
the reward yet, but some questioned the logic behind
it. Jaime Parris, a senior, said that most students
already would tell faculty about anything that threatened
student safety.
"But if it's not going to hurt other people, I
don't think many people are going to tell on their friends,"
she said. |
Inside
scarred minds
On his first visit to the Gaza Strip, Daniel Day-Lewis
meets the Palestinian families living in the heart of
the danger zone — and the psychologists who are
counselling them |
March 20, 2005
Authors in the Frontline: Daniel Day-Lewis |
Mossa'ab, the interpreter,
leads the way, carrying a white Médecins Sans Frontiéres
(MSF) flag. Its psychology team, myself and the photographer
Tom Craig are in full view of an Israeli command post
occupying the top floors of a large mill. It is draped
in camouflage netting, as is the house close by. It is
to this house that we are heading, across 200 yards of
no man's land; the last house left standing in an area
once teeming with life.
Civilians have been the main victims of the violence
inflicted by both sides in the Middle East conflict. In
the Gaza Strip the Israeli army reacts to stone-throwing
with bullets. It responds to the suicide bombs and attacks
of Palestinian militants by bulldozing houses and olive
groves in the search for the perpetrators, to punish their
families, and to set up buffer zones to protect Israeli
settlements. It bars access to villages, and multiplies
checkpoints, cutting Gaza's population off from the outside
world. MSF's psychologists are trying to help Palestinian
families cope with the stress of living within these confines;
visiting them, treating severe trauma and listening to
their stories. Their visits are the only sign sometimes
that they have not been abandoned.
Israel's tanks and armour-plated bulldozers can come
with no warning, often at night. The noise alone, to a
people who have been forced to suffer these violations
year after year, is enough to freeze the soul. Israeli
snipers position themselves on rooftops. Householders
are ordered to leave; they haven't even the time to collect
pots and pans, papers and clothes before the bulldozers
crush the unprotected buildings like dinosaurs trampling
on eggs — sometimes first mashing one into another,
then covering the remains with a scoop of earth. Those
caught in the incursion zone will be fired on. Even those
cowering inside their houses may be shot at or shelled
through walls, windows and roofs. The white flag carried
by humanitarian workers gives little protection; we'll
have warning shots fired at us twice before the week is
out.
Sometimes a family will not leave an area that is being
cleared, believing if they do leave they will lose everything.
It is a huge risk to remain. Sometimes a house is left
standing, singled out for occupation by Israeli troops.
The family is forced to remain as protection for the soldiers.
Last year an average of 120 houses were demolished each
month, leaving 1,207 homeless every month. In the past
four years 28,483 Gazans have been forcibly evicted; over
half of Gaza's usable land, mainly comprising citrus-fruit
orchards, olive groves and strawberry beds, has been destroyed.
Last year, 658 Palestinians were killed in the violence
in Gaza, and dozens of Israelis. This ploughing under,
house by house, orchard by orchard, reduces community
to wasteland, strewn and embedded with a stunted crop
of broken glass and nails, books, abandoned possessions.
As we weave our way towards the home of Abu Saguer and
his family — one of several families we will visit
today — we are treading on shattered histories and
aspirations.
Abu Saguer's own house is still standing, but its top
floor and roof are occupied by Israeli soldiers. His granddaughter
Mervat is with us, a sweet, shy seven-year-old with red
metal-rimmed glasses, her hair in two neat braids held
by flowery bands. She wears bright-red trousers and a
denim jacket. Last April her mother heard an Israeli Jeep
pull up briefly at the military-access road in front of
their house. Some projectile was fired and when Mervat
reappeared — she had been playing outside —
she was crying and her face was covered in blood. They
washed her. Her right eye was crushed. A month later in
Gaza an artificial eye was fitted. It was very uncomfortable,
so a special recommendation was needed from the Palestinian
Ministry of Health to finance a trip to Egypt for one
that fitted properly. Mervat needs this eye changed every
six months, so the ministry must negotiate with Israel
each time for permission to cross the border. Fifty cars
are permitted to cross each day; each must carry seven
people.
Abu Saguer has five sons and four daughters — "You'll
go broke with more than that," he says. He lives
near the big checkpoint of Abu Houli in southern Gaza.
He wants the photographer, Tom Craig, to take his picture
and put it on every wall in England, Germany and Russia.
He is 59. At 12 he went out to work, and at 16 he began
to build the house he had dreamt of, "slowly, slowly"
as a home and as a gathering place for his extended family.
He had grown up in a house made of mud in Khan Yunis,
which let the water in whenever it rained, and all his
pride, hope and generosity of spirit had invested itself
in this ambition. He had worked in Israel, like so many
here, before the borders were closed to all men aged between
16 and 35.
For over 20 years, Abu Saguer had his own business, selling
and transporting bamboo furniture. During the second Gulf
war all his merchandise was stolen. After that he relied
on his truck for income. He had cultivated 300 square
metres of olive trees, pomegranates, palms, guavas and
lemons in the fields around his home. After the start
of the second intifada (Palestinian uprising) his crops
were destroyed by the Israeli army — for "security".
A road that services the Israeli settlements of Gush Katif
had been built, and during our visit the traffic passes
freely backwards and forwards, along the edge of the barren
land where his orchards once flourished.
On October 15, 2000, Abu was at home with his wife when
Israeli settlers emerged on a shooting spree. He and his
family fled to Khan Yunis. After four days he returned.
He was hungry. There was no bread, no flour. He killed
four pigeons and prepared a fire on which to grill them.
The soldiers arrived suddenly, about 20 of them, and entered
the house. He followed them upstairs. "Where are
you going?" he asked. One smashed his head into a
door, breaking his nose. They kicked him down the stairs
and out of his house. They kicked half his teeth out and
left him with permanent damage to his spine. "If
you open your mouth we'll shoot you," they said.
They left, returning in a bigger group an hour later,
to occupy the top of his house, sealing the stairway with
a metal door and razor wire. The family has lived in constant
fear ever since. The soldiers urinated and defecated into
empty Coke bottles and sandbags, hurling them into his
courtyard. They menaced his children with their weapons.
After two years of this an officer asked: "Why are
you still here?" "It's my house," he replied.
For four years, Abu Saguer has been afraid to go out,
afraid to leave his wife and children alone. He is a prisoner
in his own home, just as the Palestinians are prisoners
within their own borders. The facade of self-government
is an absurdity. The Strip, with its 1.48m Palestinians,
is a vast internment camp, the borders of which shrink
as more and more demolition takes place, and within which
the population rises faster than anywhere else in the
world. Meanwhile, about 7,000 Israeli settlers live in
oases of privileged segregation. This is a state of apartheid.
It's taken me less than a week to lose impartiality. In
doing so, I may as well be throwing stones at tanks. For
as MSF's president, Jean-Hervé Bradol, has said,
"The invitation to join one side or the other is
accompanied by an obligation to collude with criminal
forms of violence."
The late Lieutenant-General Rafael Eitan, the former
chief of staff of the Israel Defense Forces (IDF), once
likened the Palestinian people to "drugged cockroaches
scurrying in a bottle". In 1980 he told his officers:
"We have to do everything to make them so miserable
they will leave." He opposed all attempts to afford
them autonomy in the occupied territories. Twenty- five
years on, it seems to me that his attitude and policy
have been applied with great gusto. Every movement here
in any of the so-called sensitive areas, which account
for a large, ever-increasing proportion of the Strip (borders,
settlements, checkpoints), is surveyed and reacted to
by a system of watchtowers.
These sinister structures cast the shadows of malign
authority across the land. On our third day, as we stood
at the tattered edge of the refugee camp at Rafah, the
forbidding borderland between Gaza and Egypt, bullets
bit into the sand a yard and a half from where we stood.
It was in this place — was it from the same watchtower?
— that Iman el-Hams, a defenceless 13-year-old schoolgirl,
had been shot just weeks before. She ran and tried to
hide from the pitiless death that came for her. I felt
her presence; the sky vibrating with the shallow, fluttering
breath of her final terror.
I read this transcript before I left home; the cold facts
ran through me like a virus. It is a radio communications
exchange by the Israel Defense Forces, Gaza, October 2004.
Four days later, crossing into Gaza, I'm still shivering:
what the hell is this place we're going to?
Soldier on guard: "We have identified someone on
two legs [code for human] 100 metres from the outpost.
Soldier in lookout: "A girl about 10." (By
now, soldiers in the outpost are shooting at the girl.)
Soldier in lookout: "She is behind the trench, half
a metre away, scared to death. The hits were right next
to her, a centimetre away."
Captain R's signalman: "We shot at her, yes, she
is apparently hit."
Captain R: "Roger, affirmative. She has just fallen.
I and a few other soldiers are moving forward to confirm
the kill."
Soldier at lookout: "Hold her down, hold her down.
There's no need to kill her."
Captain R (later): "...We carried out the shooting
and killed her... I confirmed the kill... [later]... Commanding
officer here, anyone moving in the area, even a three-year-old
kid, should be killed, over."
A military inquiry decided that the captain had "not
acted unethically". He still faces criminal charges.
Two soldiers who swore they saw him deliberately shoot
her in the head, empty his gun's entire magazine into
her inert body, now say they couldn't see if he deliberately
aimed or not; another is sticking to his damning testimony.
Every weighty bag of flour for Abu Saguer's household
must be broken up and lugged across the 200 yards of wasteland.
Everything must be carried. We are smoking apple-flavoured
shisha in the courtyard after a lunch his wife made of
bread, tomatoes, olive oil, olives and yoghurt, all from
the small plot left to him. "Take some puffs so you
can write," he says. He speaks with great urgency
and my pen lags behind. On November 7, during Ramadan's
month of fasting, a three-tiered perimeter of razor wire
was laid, encircling his house. This forced him and his
family to use the military access road, walking his children
past tanks to get to school. It's a much longer and more
dangerous route. After a week of this he was shot at from
the watchtower. Abu Saguer gathered his wife and children,
then they sat down in the road. All afternoon they sat.
"I didn't care if they crushed us there and then.
I wanted a resolution," he said. Jeeps passed, nothing
happened. After dusk they went in to break their fast.
The next day a senior officer approached them in the road.
"What's the problem? Are you on strike? What is
it, are you upset?"
"Yes."
"A lot?"
"A lot, a lot, a lot."
"Are you upset with us?"
"I'm upset with the whole lot of you."
"Why?"
"You're forcing my wife and children to walk in
front of tanks and bulldozers — I want a donkey
and cart."
"Big donkey or small donkey?"
"Big, to pull a cart."
"Impossible." (Abu Saguer, his eyes twinkling,
smoke streaming from his nose and mouth, says: "If
they'd said yes, I'd have bought a very big donkey to
bite his nose, and donkeys that bite are very inexpensive.")
"Give me a gate, then."
"We don't have gates."
"I'll make one."
He makes a gate from two pieces of wood and a wire grill.
They ask him to buy a padlock. He buys one. A soldier
supervises as he cuts through the bottom tiers of razor
wire (they won't allow the top one to be cut) and he installs
his little gate. "If the gate is left open and anything
happens, we will shoot you."
Sue Mitchell, the MSF psychologist, asks: "What's
it like for you to tell this story?"
"I release what I have in my chest," he says.
"I can't sleep. I woke this night at 1am. I thought
it was sunrise. I woke the kids and told them to go to
school. I look around and see that my life has been ruined.
I'm like a dry branch in the desert."
Psychologists have been visiting the family since shortly
after the occupation of their house began. Each time,
they have to apply for access to Israeli authorities;
it's usually granted three times out of four. Sue, a 41-year-old
Australian, has a wonderfully gentle presence. She quietly
steers her patients to and fro between the pain of their
memories and a recognition and acknowledgment of their
dignity, courage, generosity and good humour in the face
of this desperation. She encourages them to voice their
fears, tell their stories and, particularly with the children,
act out their experiences.
Abu Saguer is a man of great affability. Because of his
resilience, his wit, his tenderness with the children,
it's easy to think of his survival in heroic terms, but
often he has periods of deep depression, disorientation
and forgetfulness. "I'm not scared any more, I can't
explain it, I just don't care. There's one God, I'll die
only one time."
The soldiers have decamped for the moment, but the family
is never sure when they will come back. Part of their
home has been lost to them. We walk through those rooms
that the troops occupy. The curtains chosen with care
by Abu Saguer's wife long ago billow inwards, in unsettling
contrast to the camouflage netting in front of the window.
His gate is visible from here. I imagine him approaching
across the broken ground, struggling with a bag of flour,
stooping to unlock and open that little gate.
As we leave, Sue calls her base. Each visit must be registered
with and approved by the District Civil Liaison (DCL).
We hear that a doctor has been shot dead while treating
a wounded boy at a crossroads in Rafah that we passed
yesterday.
Entering Gaza for the first time at the Erez checkpoint,
we saw some Israeli kids in army uniform — we'd
seen them on the way from Jerusalem, hitchhiking or slouching
at bus stops, dishevelled, their uniforms accessorised
with shades and coloured scarves. Weapons were slung across
their backs. They looked like they should have been on
the way to school. One girl at Erez wearing eyeliner and
lipstick, friendly with the implied complicity of "We're
on the same side," said: "I'm laughing all the
time — I'm crazy." Most of them appeared indifferent,
almost unseeing. We walked through the concrete tunnel
separating these two worlds. In the eyes of their bosses,
we are a menace because we're witnesses. All humanitarian
workers are witnesses. The UN has been on phase-four alert,
the highest level before pulling out completely.
They're a little tired of being shot at. We travel south
from Erez toward Beit Lahiya through the area "sterilised"
during "Days of Penitence". That was Israel's
17-day military offensive in northern Gaza that started
on September 29, after a rocket fired by the Islamic militant
group Hamas killed two toddlers in the Israeli town of
Sederot, a kilometre away on the other side of the border.
These home-made rockets have a five-mile range, so Israel
sent in 2,000 troops and 200 tanks and armoured bulldozers
to set up a 61/2-mile buffer zone and "clear out"
suspected militants. Days of Penitence killed 107 Palestinians
(at least 20 of them children), left nearly 700 homeless,
and caused over $3m in property damage.
Towards the end of it, even Israeli military commanders
were urging Ariel Sharon to stop. He wouldn't listen.
So there is not a building left standing that hasn't been
acned by shells and bullets, many of them with gaping
mouths ripped out by the tanks. A vast area has been depopulated
and ground into the rubble-strewn desert we find wherever
we go. A Bedouin encampment has settled, impossibly, on
one of these wastelands. Half a dozen smug-faced camels
and a white donkey stand behind the fence waiting for
Christ knows what; the air is heavy with their scent.
The families have constructed hovels of sheet plastic,
branches and jagged pieces of rusting corrugated iron.
They look like the last scavenging survivors of doomsday.
As we head southwest towards Gaza City, the Mediterranean
Sea appears like a mirage, shocking in its beauty: Gaza's
western border.
We arrive at the MSF headquarters in Gaza City for the
daily logistical meeting. Hiba, a French-Algerian about
to complete her mission, has perhaps the most stressful
job of all: to daily organise and monitor the movements
of each of the six teams working here. She has to seek
"co-ordinations", which, in the veiled dialect
of occupation, means permission to enter and leave any
sensitive area. This she achieves, if possible, through
an Israeli DCL area commander in the department of co-ordination.
We'd met one of them — just a kid like the others
— at Erez. "Oh, Hiba, she takes it all too
personally," he'd said. As if the whole thing were
a game, with no hard feelings, between consenting adults.
Even with this "co-ordination", an MSF team
may arrive in the area only to be refused access by the
local Israeli officer in charge (or, in some cases, to
be shot at). No reason need be given. "Security,"
they're sometimes told.
Hiba is constantly assessing, reassessing, adapting.
At any moment the heavily fortified Israeli checkpoint
at Abu Houli, in the centre of the Strip, can be closed,
effectively dividing Gaza into two parts. It may remain
closed for four, six, 10 hours. It might be a security
alert or an officer's whim. Yasser, Sue's Bedouin driver,
once waited for three days to cross. We were held up there.
A Palestinian officer, identifiable by the size of his
belly, had overridden his leaner subordinates and waved
us to the front of the queue. A babble of aggressive commands
was disgorged from the IDF bunker through new burglar-proof
loudspeakers. Recently a gang of young boys had made a
human pyramid and stolen the originals. "Wah, wah,
wah," the boxes yell at you from within their razor-wire
cocoons.
Hiba rests only when the teams return safely to their
bases in Gaza City, or in the south where another MSF
apartment allows visits there to continue if the checkpoint
is closed.
At the southern MSF base in Abassan I'm awoken on our
third day at 4.30am by the call to prayer, then again
at 7am by the surprising sound of children in a school
playground. In any place, in any language, the sound is
unmistakable. Gleeful and contentious. When you're in
bed and you don't have to go to school yourself it's delicious.
Are they taught here, among other things, that they have
no future? The windows on this side of the apartment overlook
a playground of pressed dirt with a black-and-white-striped
goal of tubular metal at each end. The school, conspicuously
unmarked by bullet or shellfire, is a long two-storey
building, built in an L-shape along two sides of the pitch.
It is painted cream and pistachio and resembles a motel
in Arizona. (Later, in the refugee camp at Rafah, we'll
drive past one riddled with bullet holes, and meet a grinning
10-year-old who proudly shows us the scars, front and
back, where the bullet passed through his neck one day
at school.)
After waking, I move to the back of the flat, to the
kitchen. At the far side of a hand-tilled field warming
itself in the early sunshine stand two pristine houses,
white and cream, like miniature palaces. The field is
hemmed at one end by a row of olive trees, and at the
other by a large cactus.
A middle-aged man and woman in traditional clothes move
the drills in unison. The distance between them maintained,
gestures identical, they advance, bent at the waist, planting
one tiny onion at a time plucked from a metal bowl. If
an occupying force were ever in need of an image to advertise
the benevolence of their authority, this would be it.
I wonder what awaits them. I try but fail to imagine the
roar of a diesel engine, the filth of its exhaust, as
a bulldozer turns this idyll to dust.
Later, sipping cardamom-flavoured coffee, I look down
on a fiercely contested football game. Half the kids have
bare feet. There's a teacher on each side, in shirt and
tie. One tries a volley which, to shrieks of delight,
sails over the wall behind the goal. Two little boys watch,
arms around each other. They turn and hug for a long time,
then wander off still arm in arm. Sue Mitchell arrives.
The co-ordination we needed has come through. After the
warning shots fired at us from the watchtower at Tuffah
yesterday, we'd thought maybe the Israelis would refuse
it.
Yasmine is a grave,
self-possessed 11-year-old. She emerged from her coma
after a nine-hour operation to remove nails embedded in
her skull and brain. An exploding pin mortar had been
fired into her house. Her father was hit in the stomach
and can no longer work. I've held this type of nail in
my hand. They are black, about 1½ in long, sharpened
at one end, the tiny metal fins at the other end presumably
designed to make them spin and cause deeper penetration.
We sifted through a pile of shrapnel at the hospital,
all of it removed from victims. These jagged, twisted
fragments, some the size of an iPod, were not intended
to wound, but to eviscerate and dismember: to obliterate
their victims. Yasmine lives a short drive away from Abu
Saguer, in a ramshackle enclave with a courtyard shaded
by fig trees. Across a sterilised zone lies her cousins'
house, but it remains inaccessible (the cousins, including
the most withdrawn child Sue Mitchell has ever met, are
also her patients).
On the other side of a coil of razor wire, laid within
feet of Yasmine's house, runs a sunken lane gouged out
of the sand by tanks. When Sue first met her, Yasmine
was terrorised, screaming and throwing up during the night.
Such symptoms are common. In areas such as this, leaving
your house day or night means risking death; staying there
is no more secure. Nowhere is safe.
Under Sue's guidance, Yasmine and countless other cousins
have prepared a show which, after many last-minute whispered
reminders and much giggling, they perform for us. Yasmine
is undoubtedly the force behind this. Her power of self-expression
is immense. As she recounts the story of her wounding,
her voice rides out of her in wave upon wave, full of
pleading and admonition. Her crescent eyes burn within
a tight mask of suffering; her hands reach out to us palms
up, in supplication. At the end the tension in her fierce,
lovely face resolves into the shy smile of a performer
re-inhabiting her frailer self when the possession has
lifted. Then there is a play, with sober, stylised choreography
and a chorus of hand jives. A silent little girl whose
expression is deadpan, unchanging, play-acts being shot
by soldiers during a football game.
This four-year-old has witnessed much of the horror that
has befallen the family. She lies obediently on the ground,
splayed out and rigid. The mourners, curved in a semicircle
around her, pretend to weep and wail, but they're all
laughing behind their hands; we laugh too. Then they sing:
"Children of the world, they laugh and smile, they
go to sleep with music, they wake with music, we sleep
with shooting and we wake with shooting. Despite them
we will play, despite them we will play, despite them
we will laugh, despite them we will sing songs of love."
Yasmine doesn't join the others as they cluster around
us to say goodbye. Looking up, we see her leaning on the
parapet of the roof, smiling down on us. Silent. Her dark
face is golden in the rich, syrupy light of dusk.
Sue Mitchell is one of three psychologists here for MSF.
Each will work with about 50 families during their six-month
stay. The short-term therapy they offer is invaluable,
but in some way it seems like a battlefield dressing with
no possibility of evacuation for the injured. These stories
are unexceptional. Every room in every humble, makeshift,
bullet-ridden dwelling, in each of the labyrinthine streets
of the camps, contains a story such as this — of
loss and injury and terror. Of humiliation and despair.
What separates those of Abu Saguer and Yasmine is that
we carry their stories out with us. The others you'll
never hear about.
HOW CHILDREN LEARN TO SURVIVE ON THE FRONT LINE
Violence and bloodshed are the backdrop to the lives
of the children of Gaza. That they cling to hope and their
dignity leaves psychologists such as Sue Mitchell deeply
moved. With one group of young patients, she has produced
a practical guide to help them and children in other war-torn
areas. The children of the Abu Hassan family — 10
of them, aged from five to 13 — were caught in Israel's
Days of Penitence offensive. "They'd been shot at,
attacked, some of their houses had been demolished, they'd
seen people blown up, and had been confined in the smallest
room of their house for two weeks by Israeli soldiers,"
says Mitchell. Faces they drew in the sand showed inverted
semicircle mouths and large tears.
"I was feeling my heart small and I was unable to
talk. I thought I was going to die," said one. Mitchell
was inspired by how they coped with the trauma, and wrote
down what they told her. The result is a booklet in the
children's own words, How to Manage the Effects of
a Military Attack: Tips for Children. "Invent
games that make you laugh and help you breathe,"
says one child. "Look at each other's faces. If you
see someone is distressed, talk to them," says another.
And there are dreams for the future: "Eat olives
— the olive tree is the tree of peace."
"They're delighted by the book," says Mitchell,
"but they also underplay their strengths. They say,
'We're not so special; all Palestinian kids know how to
do this.'" |
Israeli occupation
troops have made an incursion into the centre of Nablus
in northern West Bank.
Early on Monday, the soldiers, who arrived in about 20
military vehicles backed by a helicopter, surrounded several
buildings and called on their residents to get out, apparently
looking for wanted Palestinian activists, witnesses said.
The troops have begun to demolish a house, a Palestinian
official told Aljazeera. The troops also told reporters
to leave the area.
Violent clashes erupted in central Nablus city, causing
injuries, Aljazeera's correspondent in Palestine, Hasan
al-Titi, reported.
Al-Titi said the Israeli military operation was still
under way, particularly in the northern mountainous area
in Baikar Street, adding that forces had imposed a curfew
on Huwara, a town in the south of Nablus.
Looking for activists
Israeli forces said earlier they were seeking "wanted
activists" but had not yet apprehended anyone.
Israeli forces were using police sniffer dogs to search
through adjacent buildings while two Israeli Apache aircraft
were seen hovering over the city, the correspondent added.
The raid led to a fierce clash in central Nablus between
stone-throwing Palestinian youths and Israeli forces,
injuring tens of Palestinians. Some suffered injuries
due to tear gas while others were hit by rubber bullets,
he added.
A military spokeswoman confirmed that the army had moved
into Nablus "for a routine
operation".
Aljazeera reported the Israeli forces had arrested at
least five members of the Fatah-affiliated al-Aqsa Martyrs
Brigades as well as activists of al-Awda Brigades.
One of them is Firas al-Tanbur, a member of al-Awda Brigades
in Nablus, who is one of Israel's most wanted Palestinian
resistance activists.
Settlers shelled
The raid came a few hours after Palestinian
resistance groups fired dozens of mortar shells at Israeli
settlers and troop positions in the Gaza Strip.
Resistance groups said the mortar fire
was in response to the killing of three Palestinian youths
by Israeli soldiers in the southern Gaza town of Rafah
on Saturday.
Military sources said on Sunday that 25 mortar shells
had been fired at Jewish settlements, causing damage to
three houses but no injuries.
Hamas, Islamic Jihad, al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigades, Ahmad
Abu al-Rish Brigades and the Democratic Front for the
Liberation of Palestine all have confirmed they had shelled
settlements in the Gaza Strip in retaliation for the Israeli
"crime". |
JERUSALEM (AP) - Prime
Minister Ariel Sharon said in an interview aired Monday
that there is so much tension in Israel over his Gaza
pullout plan that the atmosphere "looks like the
eve of the civil war."
Sharon said in a television interview that "all
my life I was defending life of Jews. Now for the first
time steps I'm taking to protect me from Jews."
"The tension here, the atmosphere here looks like
the eve of the civil war," said Sharon, who will
meet President George W. Bush on Monday at his Crawford,
Texas, ranch.
Sharon arrived in Waco, Texas, under heavy security and
had dinner with Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice at
his hotel Sunday night.
Sharon said that, despite the internal tensions, he was
optimistic that peace with the Palestinians could be reached.
"Yasser Arafat, first was
a military man, and during his rule there were no chances
whatsoever to reach peace," Sharon told the
interviewer. "As a matter of fact, I believe at the
current time, maybe for the first time, there is a possibility
to try and solve the problem."
Israeli military officials said Monday that Jewish settlers
in four West Bank settlements will be disarmed about two
weeks before they are to be removed from their homes this
summer, reflecting growing concern that settler resistance
to a West Bank pullback will be intense.
Settlers, however, said they would not give up their
weapons.
Israel plans to dismantle all 21 settlements in the Gaza
Strip and four in the northern West Bank in July and August,
removing about 9,000 Israelis from their homes. While
the Gaza operation will be much larger, Israeli officials
have grown increasingly worried about violence in the
West Bank.
Gaza is surrounded by a barrier and access can be easily
controlled, while West Bank settlements can be reached
from many directions. The West Bank also holds special
significance for religious Jews, raising the likelihood
that Jewish ultranationalists might pour into the settlements
to resist the evacuations.
Military officials, speaking on customary condition of
anonymity, said troops will collect all military-issue
weapons from residents of the four settlements about two
weeks before the pullout. Military commanders expect more
settler resistance in the West Bank than in Gaza, the
officials said.
Gaza settlers also will be disarmed, although the timing
of the weapons collection remains unclear, they added.
The Gaza settlers have led a vocal yearlong campaign
against the withdrawal plan.
But since Sharon won final parliamentary approval for
the pullout last month, many Gaza settlers have shown
signs of acceptance, opening negotiations with the government
over compensation and their resettlement.
The West Bank withdrawal, meanwhile, is shaping up to
be a more complicated operation than the Gaza evacuation.
"We are worried more about settlers coming from the
outside, not necessarily the residents," said a military
official, speaking on condition of anonymity.
The Yediot Ahronot daily quoted a senior military officer
as saying "violent cells" have already been
established in two of the West Bank settlements, Sa-Nur
and Homesh. The four settlements have a total population
of about 500 people.
The military official said the army is preparing a number
of actions to ensure calm, including additional weapons
collections, pre-emptive arrests and restraining orders
barring extremists from entering the settlements.
Chaim Weiss, the secretary of Homesh, said there are
no plans to confront soldiers during evacuation.
However, he said settlers would refuse to give up their
weapons, which he said are needed for protection against
Palestinians. During more than four years of Israeli-Palestinian
fighting, Palestinian militants have repeatedly attacked
settlements and opened fire on Israeli motorists in the
West Bank.
"We need to defend ourselves and our families,"
Weiss said. "I think it will be a tragedy to take
our weapons."
Weiss also disputed the report of extremists setting
up operations in Homesh, though he said it was possible
that outsiders could try to cause trouble. "If there
will be violence, it will be from outsiders who want to
create a provocation," he said.
The army said it will provide adequate security for settlers.
Military officials have long planned for the possibility
of Palestinian attacks on soldiers and settlers during
the withdrawal.
A two-month-old ceasefire has become
strained in recent days, following the killing of three
Palestinian youths by Israeli troops in the Gaza Strip
and retaliatory shelling by militants.
Sharon said Palestinian mortar and rocket
fire "is a flagrant violation of the understandings"
on a ceasefire he reached with Palestinian leader Mahmoud
Abbas at a February summit.
"This will be a central issue to
be raised in my talks with President Bush," he said.
|
US President George
Bush will host Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon at
his Texas ranch in a reaffirmation of US support for the
proposed Gaza pullout.
US concerns - which Bush has said he plans to raise with
Sharon - about a project still in its preliminary stages
to expand a major Jewish settlement in the West Bank,
could inject a rare note of discord into talks between
the two allies.
But US and Israeli officials played down any notion Bush
would on Monday try to sour Sharon's first taste of homestead
hospitality at the presidential spread in Crawford, a
visit capping a year of political fighting in Israel for
the Gaza plan's survival.
An outbreak of violence in the Gaza Strip over the weekend
could provide the backdrop for Sharon to try to focus
the summit on his bedrock demand, echoed by Washington,
that Palestinian President Mahmud Abbas should do more
to rein in resistance fighters.
"They are pointing a gun to [Abbas'] head,"
a senior Israeli
official, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said about
Palestinian resistance groups that fired dozens of mortar
bombs at Jewish settlements in Gaza over the weekend.
Escalation in violence
The violence was the most serious in the area since Abbas
and Sharon declared a ceasefire at a summit in Sharm al-Shaikh,
Egypt, in February. The attacks followed the killing of
three unarmed Palestinian youths by Israeli troops in
southern Gaza.
"The firing [of the mortars] was a flagrant violation
of the understanding achieved at Sharm al-Shaikh and it
will be a central issue to be raised in my talks with
President Bush," an aide quoted Sharon as saying
on the flight to Texas on Sunday.
"Abbas is weak. He needs assistance, but you can
only help someone who helps himself," added a senior
Israeli official.
Promoting his plan to remove all 21 Jewish settlements
in Gaza and four of 120 in the West Bank, Sharon often
cited Bush's assurances during his previous US trip last
April that Israel would not be expected to give up some
large West Bank settlement blocs in future peace deals.
But Sharon appeared to go a step too far for Washington
by pledging last week to press ahead with construction
of 3500 homes for Israelis in a narrow corridor between
the West Bank settlement of Maale Adumim and Jerusalem.
Heavy security
Sharon's hotel in Waco, about 40km from Bush's ranch,
was surrounded by a tight cordon of security with large
trucks blocking intersections.
Late on Sunday, he met US Secretary of State Condoleezza
Rice at the hotel to prepare for the morning meeting with
the president.
Israeli officials said they expected Bush to reaffirm
his strong backing for the Gaza withdrawal set for July,
the first removal of Jewish settlements from occupied
land Palestinians want for a state.
Bush is also expected to tell Sharon there can be no
expansion of Jewish settlements under the US-backed Middle
East road map peace plan.
It calls for a freeze of Israeli "settlement activity"
as part of mutual steps with the Palestinians, leading
to the creation of a Palestinian state alongside a secure
Israel.
Israeli officials rushed to assure the US there would
be no new work at Maale Adumim for at least two years.
"It must stop," Vice-Premier Shimon Peres told
Israel's Army Radio, referring to the settlement plan.
"Until the end of the Gaza process, I think we should
not be making more problems."
'Important visit'
"With no doubt, Sharon's visit to the US is very
important," chief Palestinian megotiator Saib Uraiqat
told Aljazeera. Sharon would want to tell Bush that Abbas
did not do what was required of him, which was halting
the violence.
"In addition, Sharon will tell Bush that Maale Adumim
settlement should be joined to Israel," Uraiqat said,
adding that the Israeli government would consider a withdrawal
from Gaza and northern West Bank only, and nothing would
happen after that for years.
"This will lead to an endless crisis," he said.
"Sharon intends to cancel the issues of Jerusalem,
the refugees and the borders. This will put us in a new
transitional stage by considering a state with temporary
borders," Uraiqat said. |
New Zealand Prime Minister
Helen Clark announced Sunday she is suspending fellow
Labor MP John Tamihere for saying he is “sick
and tired of hearing how many Jews got gassed.”
Clark said in statement that party leaders decided
Tamihere was to go on “extended leave” and
would not participate in upcoming party activities.
She added the statements made by Tamihere were “deeply
offensive” and “utterly unacceptable.”
According to a New Zealand Herald report, in response
to a question by Investigate Magazine on how the country’s
society can focus on the wrongdoings of the past, Tamihere
said, "The Wiesenthal Institute
is the same. I’m sick and tired of hearing how
many Jews got gassed, not because I’m not revolted
by it - I am - or I’m not violated by it - I am
- but because I already know that.”
"How many times do I have to
be told and made to feel guilty?" he said.
The statement evoked harsh responses from Jewish organizations.
Tamihere initially denied remarks
David Zwartz, president of the New Zealand Jewish
Council, said Mr. Tamihere’s comment was sickening
for New Zealand Jews who suffered in the Holocaust and
whose families were gassed.
"It is deeply shocking for all
other Jews," he said. “Jews have no desire
to make Mr. Tamihere or anyone feel guilty, we only
want to have the historic truth known and understood
so discrimination and oppression leading to genocide
won’t happen again." |
WASHINGTON (AP) - President
Bush signed an executive order Friday authorizing the
government to impose a quarantine to deal with any outbreak
of a particularly lethal variation of influenza now
found in Southeast Asia.
The order is intended to deal with a type of influenza
commonly referred to as bird flu. Since January 2004,
an estimated 69 people, primarily in Vietnam, have contracted
the disease. But Dr. Keiji Fukuda, a flu expert at the
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, has said
he suspects there are more cases.
The fatality rate among those reported to have the
disease is about 70 percent.
Health officials around the world are trying to monitor
the virus closely because some flu pandemics are believed
to have originated with birds.
Bush's order was described as a standby precaution,
adding pandemic influenza to the government's list of
communicable diseases for which a quarantine is authorized.
It gives the government legal authority to detain or
isolate a passenger arriving in the United States to
prevent an infection from spreading.
The authority would be used only if the passenger posed
a threat to public health and refused to cooperate with
a voluntary request, the Health and Human Services Department
said.
The quarantine list was amended in 2003 to include
SARS, severe acute respiratory syndrome, which killed
nearly 800 people in 2003. Other diseases on the list
are cholera, diptheria, infectious tuberculosis, plague,
smallpox, yellow fever and viral hemorrhagic fevers. |
Computers are being
used to mark American university students' essays in
a project which could radically alter the teaching role
of academics.
Qualrus, a program developed at the University of Missouri,
offers instant feedback on even complex subjects.
It picks up word patterns, from which it can tell whether
students' arguments are sound, and gives the essay a
score.
Its developer, Professor Edward Brent, says Qualrus
will save staff hundreds of hours of marking time.
'Compares candidates'
He told the BBC News website: "The program uses
several different intelligence strategies.
"It compares the information with that offered
by all previous candidates and the information entered
previously by the course tutor."
Students taking Prof Brent's sociology course submit
their draft essays online and receive detailed feedback
within a couple of seconds.
It gives a numerical score based on the weight instructors
place on different parts of the assignment. [...] |
DENVER - Hundreds of travelers
were stranded at the Denver airport and along highways
Sunday as a blizzard blew across eastern Colorado with
wet, heavy snow.
Seven to 10 inches of snow was forecast in Denver and
up to 30 inches was possible in the foothills west of
Denver, Colorado Springs and Boulder, the National Weather
Service said. [...]
Fat, moisture-laden snowflakes were blown sideways
by wind gusting to 30 mph. Xcel Energy reported that
11,000 customers were without power in the heavily populated
Front Range region. [...]
Whiteout conditions shut down a 16-mile stretch of
heavily traveled Interstate 25 between Denver and Colorado
Springs, 60 miles to the south. I-70 was closed in both
directions in the Denver area. The state Department
of Transportation said crews reported whiteout conditions
on Interstate 76 near the Nebraska state line. [...]
Three state-run prisons in Denver
were also closed to visitors by weather for the first
time ever, said Alison Morgan, spokeswoman for the state
corrections department. [...] |
HONG KONG, April 11
(Xinhuanet) -- An intense earthquake measuring6.0 on the
Richter scale jolted the sea near Sumatra of Indonesia
at 1:30 a.m. (Hong Kong time) Monday.
According to the Hong Kong Observatory, the epicenter
was initially determined to be 1.6 south latitude and
99.7 east longitude, about 100 kilometers southwest of
Padang.
There were no immediate reports of injuries or damage.
The quake was followed by a series of aftershocks. An
earlier quake hit Sunday near Siberut Island, 109 kilometers
southwest of Painan, a neighboring town to Padang, causing
some panic among local residents. |
Tokyo - A major earthquake
measuring 6.1 on the Richter scale rattled Tokyo early
Monday as commuters headed to work, reviving fears of
the dreaded "Big One" predicted to hit Japan
in the future.
The quake was the biggest since a tremor of equal magnitude
that hit the Kanto region centring on Tokyo in June
2000, but there were no reports of major damage or casualties.
|
MANILA, April 11 (Xinhuanet)
-- A 4-magnitude earthquake shook Butuan City in Mindanao,
southern Philippines, and its surroundingareas at 04:00
a.m. local time Monday, said the Philippine Institute
of Volcanology and Seismology (PHIVOLCS).
PHIVOLCS said the earthquake's epicenter was located
40 kilometers west of Butuan City and was tectonic in
origin. The quake started at the eastern Mindanao segment,
it said.
No casualty or damage was reported in the earthquake. |
BEIJING, April 11 --
A hailstorm in Sichuan Province and Chongqing Municipality
has left 18 dead, one person missing and 25 injured, the
People's Daily reported yesterday.
The biggest hailstorm, which fell in Chongqing, reached
13 centimetres in diameter, according to local reports.
Chongqing's eight districts also experienced gales and
140 millimetres of rainfall in last Friday's storm.
According to the municipal Office of Disaster and Social
Relief, about 458,000 residents in 80 counties and towns
in Chongqing were hit by bad weather, leaving five dead
and 25 injured.
It is estimated that 140 million yuan (US$17 million)
of damage was caused.
Qianjiang District in Chongqing was the worst affected,
with hailstones destroying more than 27,800 houses and
local crops. In this district alone, there was damage
worth 35 million yuan (US$4.2 million).
Many cities in Sichuan were also affected by strong
winds and heavy rainfall. Some cities, such as Leshan,
Dazhou and Yibin, were also hit by hailstorms.
Thirteen people died in the province.
Ye Sheng, deputy director of Gaoxian County's Party
committee in Yibin, said he witnessed a hailstorm that
lasted for about one-and-a-half hours on Friday.
He said some hailstones were as big as eggs, and even
small ones were the size of peas. "Many houses were
pierced by the hail. It is the most serious hailstorm
for 20 years in the county," he was quoted by People's
Daily as saying. |
A MIGHTY blast of radiation from
an exploding star may have wiped out much of life in
the sea 450 million years ago, scientists claim.
New research suggests that a gamma ray burst could
have been responsible for the Ordovican mass extinction
in which 60 per cent of all marine invertebrates died.
Gamma ray bursts are immensely powerful surges of radiation.
Many are thought to have been caused by the explosions
of stars over 15 times more massive than the Sun.
A burst creates two beams of gamma ray energy that
race off across space in opposite directions.
The Ordovican mass extinction can be explained by a
gamma ray burst within 6,000 light years of Earth, say
scientists from the US space agency NASA and the University
of Kansas.
Dr Adrian Melott, from the university, said: "A
gamma ray burst originating within 6,000 light years
from Earth would have a devastating effect on life.
We don’t know exactly when one came, but we’re
rather sure it did come - and left its mark."
Such a burst would strip the Earth of its protective
ozone layer, allowing deadly ultraviolet radiation to
pour down from the Sun.
Computer models showed that up to half the ozone layer
could be destroyed within weeks. Five years later, at
least 10 per cent would still be missing.
"What’s surprising is that just a ten-second-burst
can cause years of devastating ozone damage," said
Dr Melott. [...] |
THE search for extraterrestrial
intelligence (SETI) could be taking the wrong approach.
Instead of listening for alien radio broadcasts, a
better strategy may be to look for giant structures
placed in orbit around nearby stars by alien civilisations.
"Artificial structures
may be the best way for an advanced extraterrestrial
civilisation to signal its presence to an emerging technology
like ours," says Luc Arnold of the Observatory
of Haute-Provence in France. And he believes that the
generation of space-based telescopes now being designed
will be able to spot them.
Arnold has studied the capabilities of space-based
telescopes such as the European Space Agency's forthcoming
Corot telescope and NASA's Kepler. These instruments
will look for the telltale dimming of a star's light
when a planet passes in front of it. They could also
identify an artificial object the size of a planet,
such as a lightweight solar sail, says Arnold. His work
will be published in The Astrophysical Journal (www.arxiv.org/astro-ph/0503580).
Arnold has determined the characteristic transit signal
that differently shaped objects would produce, including
a Jupiter-sized equilateral triangle and a louvre -
parallel slats with gaps between them. Corot and Kepler
will be capable of distinguishing these objects from
most planets, though they could still be confused with
a ringed planet like Saturn, he says.
To ensure the signal is unambiguous, an alien civilisation
would have to launch a number of objects into orbit
around a star. As an example, Arnold imagines 11 objects
orbiting a star in groups of one, two, three and five
- the first prime numbers. The time interval between
each group could also encode prime numbers if the objects
were powered rather than orbiting freely. He thinks
any civilisation that can engineer giant structures
in space would probably not find this a problem.
Arnold believes that this type of signalling is at
least as effective as broadcasting a message using a
high-powered laser pulse or a radio signal, which SETI
is searching for.
The best place to begin looking for artificial structures
could be around dwarf stars. Their small size means
they can be dimmed by the transit of a relatively small
object, making them the best bet for an advanced civilisation
wishing to announce itself.
“Space telescopes could identify an artificial
object the size of a planet, such as a lightweight solar
sail”
But SETI researchers aren't changing tack just yet.
"Arnold's proposal falls within the category of
SETT - the search for extraterrestrial technology,"
says Paul Schuch, executive director of The SETI League
in New Jersey. "SETT is entirely complementary
to SETI, which is narrowly defined as the search for
electromagnetic emissions from other technological societies.
The SETI League actively encourages and enthusiastically
endorses such research," he adds. |
Readers
who wish to know more about who we are and what we do may visit
our portal site Quantum
Future
Remember,
we need your help to collect information on what is going on in
your part of the world!
We also need help to keep
the Signs of the Times online.
Send
your comments and article suggestions to us
Fair Use Policy Contact Webmaster at signs-of-the-times.org Cassiopaean materials Copyright ©1994-2014 Arkadiusz Jadczyk and Laura Knight-Jadczyk. All rights reserved. "Cassiopaea, Cassiopaean, Cassiopaeans," is a registered trademark of Arkadiusz Jadczyk and Laura Knight-Jadczyk. Letters addressed to Cassiopaea, Quantum Future School, Ark or Laura, become the property of Arkadiusz Jadczyk and Laura Knight-Jadczyk Republication and re-dissemination of our copyrighted material in any manner is expressly prohibited without prior written consent.
|